Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDavies, Althea L.
dc.contributor.authorStreeter, Richard T.
dc.contributor.authorLawson, Ian T.
dc.contributor.authorRoucoux, Katherine H.
dc.contributor.authorHiles, William
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-13T14:30:05Z
dc.date.available2018-06-13T14:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-01
dc.identifier.citationDavies , A L , Streeter , R T , Lawson , I T , Roucoux , K H & Hiles , W 2018 , ' The application of resilience concepts in palaeoecology ' , The Holocene , vol. 28 , no. 9 , pp. 1523-1534 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683618777077en
dc.identifier.issn0959-6836
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 251882036
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 06b9eed1-a84a-40c8-bb00-06e0f449d654
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85048983581
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000443315700012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/14018
dc.description.abstractThe concept of resilience has become increasingly important in ecological and socio-ecological literature. With its focus on the temporal behaviour of ecosystems, palaeoecology has an important role to play in developing a scientific understanding of ecological resilience. We provide a critical review of the ways in which resilience is being addressed by palaeoecologists. We review ~180 papers, identifying the definitions or conceptualisations of ‘resilience’ that they use, and analysing the ways in which palaeoecology is contributing to our understanding of ecological resilience. We identify three key areas for further development. Firstly, the term ‘resilience’ is frequently defined too broadly to be meaningful without further qualification. In particular, palaeoecologists need to distinguish between ‘press’ vs. ‘pulse’ disturbances, and ‘ecological’ vs. ‘engineering’ resilience. Palaeoecologists are well placed to critically assess the extent to which these dichotomies apply in real (rather than theoretical) ecosystems, where climate and other environmental parameters are constantly changing. Secondly, defining a formal ‘response model’ - a statement of the anticipated relationships between proxies, disturbances and resilience properties - can help to clarify arguments, especially inferred causal links, since the difficulty of proving causation is a fundamental limitation of palaeoecology for understanding ecosystem drivers and responses. Thirdly, there is a need for critical analysis of the role of scale in ecosystem resilience. Different palaeoenvironmental proxies are differently able to address the various temporal and spatial scales of ecological change, and these limitations, as well as methodological constraints on inherently noisy proxy data, need to be explored and addressed.
dc.format.extent12
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Holoceneen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018, © SAGE Publications. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683618777077en
dc.subjectDisturbance regimeen
dc.subjectEcosystem dynamicsen
dc.subjectEcosystem modellingen
dc.subjectEnvironmental changeen
dc.subjectPalaeoenvironmentalen
dc.subjectSocio-ecological systemsen
dc.subjectG Geography (General)en
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subject.lccG1en
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.titleThe application of resilience concepts in palaeoecologyen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0959683618777077
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record