Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHart, Trevor A.
dc.contributor.authorMcArthur, M. Jane
dc.coverage.spatialvi, 317 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis I respond to Miroslav Volfs proposal that in the eschaton painful memories will be forgotten in order not to detract from the joy of the New Creation. Through consideration of the constitution of personal identity and memory I will show that his proposal is problematic if, in the New Creation, persons are to be continuous with themselves. In my chapter on forgiveness I show that that it is possible, through forgiveness, for people to come to remember even the most painful of experiences without experiencing pain anew, I will show that painful memories can be healed and transformed, and thus that eschatological forgetting is not necessary. I will argue in the final chapter that, just as in his resurrection body Christ bore scars of the crucifixion, so in the New Creation we too will bear scars from our earthly lives. The main sources in the chapter on personal identity are John Macmurray, Alastair McFadyen and, to a lesser extent, Paul Ricoeur. The work of Gregory Jones is significant in chapters 2 and 3 (looking at memory and forgiveness respectively). In chapter 4 (New Creation) I have drawn on the work of Jurgen Moltmann as well as that of Bauckham and Hart.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subject.lcshVolf, Miroslav
dc.subject.lcshFuture lifeen
dc.subject.lcshMemory--Religious aspects--Christianityen
dc.subject.lcshSelf--Religious aspects--Christianityen
dc.titleMemory in the New Creation : a critical response to Miroslav Volf's eschatological forgettingen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record