Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDanchev, Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-06T23:33:22Z
dc.date.available2018-05-06T23:33:22Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-01
dc.identifier242202235
dc.identifier694e42f6-369f-412d-af14-ea589e761509
dc.identifier84983084982
dc.identifier.citationDanchev , A 2016 , ' Bug splat : the art of the drone ' , International Affairs , vol. 92 , no. 3 , pp. 703-713 . https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12609en
dc.identifier.issn0020-5850
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/13305
dc.description.abstractThis review article considers a variety of artworks, including stories, poems, plays, photographs and films, to explore what ‘drone art’ or ‘drone aesthetics’ can tell us about the politics and ethics of drone operations or drone warfare. The article finds that the politics and the ethics are troublesome and troubling; and that the art illuminates some important issues, through the focus on the drone pilot or operator, and, more fundamentally, through the exposure of what has been called an ‘empathy gap’. The attention paid to the drone operator is admirable, as far as it goes. It has unquestionably served to demystify drone operations, and in a certain sense to humanize drone warfare. Democracy is founded upon visibility. To see the drone, it will be necessary to capture it, and contemplate it, from different points of view.
dc.format.extent90
dc.format.extent419741
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Affairsen
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleBug splat : the art of the droneen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.contributor.sponsorThe Leverhulme Trusten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of International Relationsen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-2346.12609
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-05-06
dc.identifier.grantnumberMRF-2013-073en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record