Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorPaipais, Vassilios
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-26T10:30:05Z
dc.date.available2018-04-26T10:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-01
dc.identifier.citationPaipais , V 2018 , ' “Already/not yet” : St Paul’s eschatology and the modern critique of historicism ' , Philosophy & Social Criticism , vol. 44 , no. 9 , pp. 1015-1038 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453718769455en
dc.identifier.issn0191-4537
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252850657
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 9a6b0df1-e358-4041-95be-df20bcea6d29
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:4BD45C039F3F2CD93996162C466F1A05
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85045639671
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000450157600005
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5564-3597/work/62311924
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/13230
dc.description.abstractThis paper interrogates some prominent post-Marxist engagements with St Paul’s messianism by reading them in the theological context of the anti-historicist revival of Pauline eschatology in the twentieth century. In both readings, the means through which the critique of historicism is delivered is the revival of the eschatological core of Paul’s proclamation. Paul is read as inaugurating a “new world” of freedom, love and redemptive hope as opposed to the “old world” of oppression, sorrow, death and despair. And yet, it is exactly in such an apocalyptic reading of Pauline eschatology that both philosophical and theological critiques of historicism, despite protestations to the contrary, remain prisoners to the aporias of a historicist temporality. The symptom of the philosophers’ residual parasitism on historicism is expressed as antinomian negativism, while in the case of the theologians it can take the form of a self-assured Church triumphalism.
dc.format.extent24
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophy & Social Criticismen
dc.rights© 2018 the Author. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453718769455en
dc.subjectSt Paulen
dc.subjectEschatologyen
dc.subjectHistoricismen
dc.subjectAlain Badiouen
dc.subjectSlavoj Žižeken
dc.subjectGiorgio Agambenen
dc.subjectHenri de Lubacen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectBR Christianityen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subjectR2Cen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.subject.lccBRen
dc.title“Already/not yet” : St Paul’s eschatology and the modern critique of historicismen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of International Relationsen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0191453718769455
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record