Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorNagarajan, Sanjay
dc.contributor.authorSkillen, Nathan C.
dc.contributor.authorIrvine, John T. S.
dc.contributor.authorLawton, Linda A.
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Peter K. J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T23:33:33Z
dc.date.available2018-04-12T23:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.identifier.citationNagarajan , S , Skillen , N C , Irvine , J T S , Lawton , L A & Robertson , P K J 2017 , ' Cellulose II as bioethanol feedstock and its advantages over native cellulose ' , Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , vol. 77 , pp. 182-192 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.118en
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 249678071
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f0ae0251-8d01-44d4-a49f-36133d116ce9
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:ADF035845A97DD86A32E16E7E1739674
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85017289177
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000404704500013
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8394-3359/work/68280888
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/13128
dc.description.abstractAlternative renewable energy must emerge to sustainably meet the energy demands of the present and future. Current alternatives to fossil fuels are electricity from solar, wind and tidal energies and biofuels. Biofuels, especially bioethanol could be produced from lignocellulosic feedstock via pre-treatment and fermentation. The cellulose I content of most lignocellulosic feedstock is significant, yet its highly crystalline amphiphilic structure interlinked with the lignin network makes it difficult to process for bioethanol production. Processing lignocellulosic biomass via a range of physico-chemical, mechanical and biological pre-treatment methods have been well established, however a relatively new area on the use of cellulose II (a polymorph of native cellulose obtained via mercerisation or regeneration) for the production of bioethanol is still in its early stages. Hence, this review discusses in detail the advantages of using cellulose II over cellulose I as feedstock for bioethanol production. Furthermore, current green and sustainable methods for cellulose II production and the advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. In addition, examples from literature reporting higher fermentable sugar and bioethanol yields using cellulose II as feedstock are reviewed, thereby highlighting its importance in the field of bioethanol production. The conclusion from this review suggests that, in all the cases studied, fermentable sugar and/or bioethanol production was found to be higher when cellulose II was used as feedstock instead of native cellulose/lignocellulosic biomass. This higher yield could be attributed to the modified structural and lattice arrangement of cellulose II, its porous volume and degree of polymerisation.
dc.format.extent11
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviewsen
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.118en
dc.subjectCellulose IIen
dc.subjectLignocellulosic biomassen
dc.subjectFermentable sugarsen
dc.subjectBioethanolen
dc.subjectAmphiphilicen
dc.subjectQD Chemistryen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subjectSDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energyen
dc.subject.lccQDen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleCellulose II as bioethanol feedstock and its advantages over native celluloseen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorEPSRCen
dc.contributor.sponsorEPSRCen
dc.contributor.sponsorThe Royal Societyen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Chemistryen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. EaSTCHEMen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.118
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-04-12
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/K036769/1en
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/K015540/1en
dc.identifier.grantnumberWRMA 2012/R2en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record