Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorConnor, M.
dc.contributor.authorCurrie, Candace Evelyn
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T14:30:48Z
dc.date.available2018-04-12T14:30:48Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-30
dc.identifier.citationConnor , M , Currie , C E & Lawrence , A 2018 , ' Factors influencing the prevalence of animal cruelty during adolescence ' , Journal of Interpersonal Violence , vol. Online First . https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518771684en
dc.identifier.issn0886-2605
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252751359
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: e5946931-159f-46d5-a2fc-dd80e395dc13
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85102761252
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000630100900004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/13125
dc.description.abstractAdolescents’ interactions with animals are of increasing interest and their beneficial developmental outcomes are well known. However, negative interactions such as perpetrating cruelty toward animals during childhood and adolescence have been related with child abuse, domestic violence, and later interpersonal violence. Cruelty toward animals by adolescents has been reported predominately in criminal and clinical samples, and links have been made between animal cruelty and interpersonal violence. However, studies often lack a clear definition of animal cruelty and the animal involved. The present study addresses methodological shortcomings by providing a clear definition of the cruelty acts and the animals involved and the time frame within which cruelty acts have been taken place. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of animal cruelty of 979 British adolescents (419 male, 497 female, Mage = 15.1 ± 1.57 years) by means of a survey questionnaire administered in school. Animal cruelty was investigated encompassing deliberate and nondeliberate cruelty acts, a clear definition of the target animals was included and a time frame was provided. Furthermore, acceptability of animal cruelty, engaging in antisocial behavior, and family affluence were investigated. Results show high reliabilities for the measures applied. Exploratory factor analysis reveals different types of animal cruelty. Gender differences were observed for deliberate and accidental cruelty acts, with boys reporting higher levels than girls. Younger adolescents reported higher accidental cruelty acts than older ones. Acceptance of animal cruelty played a significant role in predicting animal cruelty, together with antisocial behaviors and place of living. The present study shows for the first time the importance of distinguishing between different types of animal cruelty and defining the animals involved.
dc.format.extent24
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Interpersonal Violenceen
dc.rights© 2018, the Author(s). This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at http://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518771684en
dc.subjectYouth violenceen
dc.subjectCriminologyen
dc.subjectCommunity violenceen
dc.subjectHV Social pathology. Social and public welfareen
dc.subjectRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicineen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subjectSDG 5 - Gender Equalityen
dc.subjectSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutionsen
dc.subject.lccHVen
dc.subject.lccRA0421en
dc.titleFactors influencing the prevalence of animal cruelty during adolescenceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. WHO Collaborating Centre for International Child & Adolescent Health Policyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Child and Adolescent Health Research Uniten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518771684
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record