Using self-organizing maps to classify humpback whale song units and quantify their similarity
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Classification of vocal signals can be undertaken using a wide variety of qualitative and quantitative techniques. Using east Australian humpback whale song from 2002-2014, a subset of vocal signals were acoustically measured and then classified using a self-organizing map (SOM). The SOM created 1) an acoustic dictionary of units representing the song’s repertoire, and 2) Cartesian distance measurements among all unit types (SOM nodes). Utilizing the SOM dictionary as a guide, additional song recordings from east Australia were rapidly (manually) transcribed. To assess the similarity in song sequences, the Cartesian distance output from the SOM was applied in Levenshtein distance similarity analyses as a weighting factor to better incorporate unit similarity in the calculation (previously a qualitative process). SOMs provide a more robust and repeatable means of categorizing acoustic signals along with a clear quantitative measurement of sound type similarity based on acoustic features. This method can be utilized for a wide variety of acoustic databases especially those containing very large datasets, and be applied across the vocalization research community to help address concerns surrounding inconsistency in manual classification.
Allen , J A , Murray , A , Noad , M J , Dunlop , R A & Garland , E C 2017 , ' Using self-organizing maps to classify humpback whale song units and quantify their similarity ' , Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , vol. 142 , no. 4 , pp. 1943-1952 . https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4982040
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
© 2017, Acoustical Society of America. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4982040
DescriptionE.C.G. was funded by a Royal Society Newton International Fellowship.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.