Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Niall
dc.contributor.authorOzakinci, Gozde
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T11:30:11Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T11:30:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-27
dc.identifier.citationAnderson , N & Ozakinci , G 2018 , ' Effectiveness of psychological interventions to improve quality of life in people with long-term conditions : rapid systematic review of randomised controlled trials ' , BMC Psychology , vol. 6 , 11 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0225-4en
dc.identifier.issn2050-7283
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252534174
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 9f517bae-510e-4c52-a25f-d5142f95f067
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85044351291
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5869-3274/work/43149752
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/13041
dc.description.abstractBackground: Long-term conditions may negatively impact multiple aspects of quality of life including physical functioning and mental wellbeing. The rapid systematic review aimed to examine the effectiveness of psychological interventions to improve quality of life in people with long-term conditions to inform future healthcare provision and research. Methods: EBSCOhost and OVID were used to search four databases (PsychInfo, PBSC, Medline and Embase). Relevant papers were systematically extracted by one researcher using the predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria based on titles, abstracts, and full texts. Randomized controlled trial psychological interventions conducted between 2006 and February 2016 to directly target and assess people with long-term conditions in order to improve quality of life were included. Interventions without long-term condition populations, psychological intervention and/or patient-assessed quality of life were excluded. Results: From 2223 citations identified, 6 satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria. All 6 studies significantly improved at least one quality of life outcome immediately post-intervention. Significant quality of life improvements were maintained at 12-months follow-up in one out of two studies for each of the short- (0–3 months), medium- (3–12 months), and long-term (≥ 12 months) study duration categories. Conclusions: All 6 psychological intervention studies significantly improved at least one quality of life outcome immediately post-intervention, with three out of six studies maintaining effects up to 12-months post-intervention. Future studies should seek to assess the efficacy of tailored psychological interventions using different formats, durations and facilitators to supplement healthcare provision and practice.
dc.format.extent17
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Psychologyen
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2018. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en
dc.subjectLong-termen
dc.subjectPhysicalen
dc.subjectConditionsen
dc.subjectPsychologicalen
dc.subjectInterventionen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectQualityen
dc.subjectLifeen
dc.subjectMentalen
dc.subjectWellbeingen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectRC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatryen
dc.subjectT-DASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.subject.lccRC0321en
dc.titleEffectiveness of psychological interventions to improve quality of life in people with long-term conditions : rapid systematic review of randomised controlled trialsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Health Psychologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0225-4
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record