Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWatkins, Christopher D.
dc.contributor.authorNicholls, Mike J.
dc.contributor.authorBatres, Carlota
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Dengke
dc.contributor.authorTalamas, Sean
dc.contributor.authorPerrett, David I.
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-23T00:33:08Z
dc.date.available2018-03-23T00:33:08Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.identifier.citationWatkins , C D , Nicholls , M J , Batres , C , Xiao , D , Talamas , S & Perrett , D I 2017 , ' Own attractiveness and perceived relationship quality shape sensitivity in women’s memory for other men on the attractiveness dimension ' Cognition , vol. 163 , pp. 146-154 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.007en
dc.identifier.issn0010-0277
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 249386225
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: c9a14f46-8b43-43b1-bc3b-340fb5fd8193
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85015901304
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000399861800013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/13003
dc.descriptionThis research was gratefully-funded by a Carnegie Research Incentives Grant awarded to the first-author (Ref #70014).en
dc.description.abstractAlthough recent work suggests that opposite-sex facial attractiveness is less salient in memory when individuals are in a committed romantic relationship, romantic relationship quality can vary over time. In light of this, we tested whether activating concerns about romantic relationship quality strengthens memory for attractive faces. Partnered women were exposed briefly to faces manipulated in shape cues to attractiveness before either being asked to think about a moment of emotional closeness or distance in their current relationship. We measured sensitivity in memory for faces as the extent to which they recognized correct versions of studied faces over versions of the same person altered to look either more or less-attractive than their original (i.e. studied) version. Contrary to predictions, high relationship quality strengthened hit rate for faces regardless of the sex or attractiveness of the face. In general, women’s memories were more sensitive to attractiveness in women, but were biased toward attractiveness in male faces, both when responding to unfamiliar faces and versions of familiar faces that were more attractive than the original male identity from the learning phase. However, findings varied according to self-rated attractiveness and a psychometric measure of the quality of their current relationship. Attractive women were more sensitive to attractiveness in men, while their less-attractive peers had a stronger bias to remember women as more attractive and men as less-attractive than their original image respectively. Women in better-quality romantic relationships had stronger positive biases toward, and false memories for, attractive men. Our findings suggest a sophisticated pattern of sensitivity and bias in women’s memory for facial cues to quality that varies systematically according to factors that may alter the costs of female mating competition (‘market demand’) and relationship maintenance.
dc.format.extent8
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCognitionen
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.007en
dc.subjectPerson memoryen
dc.subjectQualityen
dc.subjectFemale competitionen
dc.subjectExtra-pair matingen
dc.subjectIdentifyen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleOwn attractiveness and perceived relationship quality shape sensitivity in women’s memory for other men on the attractiveness dimensionen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.007
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-03-22
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027717300720#appd002en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record