Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorPhillips, André
dc.contributor.authorReichard, Martin
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Carl
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-18T00:32:51Z
dc.date.available2018-03-18T00:32:51Z
dc.date.issued2017-04
dc.identifier.citationPhillips , A , Reichard , M & Smith , C 2017 , ' Sex differences in the responses to oviposition site cues by a fish revealed by tests with an artificial host ' , Animal Behaviour , vol. 126 , pp. 187-194 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.02.011en
dc.identifier.issn0003-3472
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 249406540
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 0375421e-3705-4b84-81d9-bc509767d5e0
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:15A3C9626D9EFAB0DDF9DC493F023158
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85015698462
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3285-0379/work/47136220
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000400402700019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/12971
dc.descriptionFunding came from the Czech Science Foundation (13-05872S).en
dc.description.abstractOviposition decisions can have important fitness consequences for offspring. We investigated the responses of European bitterling, Rhodeus amarus, a freshwater fish that spawns in the gills of living unionid mussels, to oviposition site cues. Using an artificial mussel, we manipulated the flow velocity, dissolved oxygen concentration and odour cues of mussels presented to pairs of R. amarus. Females responded positively to mussel odour and to dissolved oxygen cues. Male response was dependent on mussel odour and the flow velocity of water emerging from the artificial mussel. These responses are potentially adaptive, with females responding to cues that indicate the quality of oviposition sites for incubation of eggs. Males responded to cues with implications for optimal sperm allocation.
dc.format.extent8
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Behaviouren
dc.rights© 2017, The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at www.sciencedirect.com / http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.02.011en
dc.subjectMaternal effecten
dc.subjectMusselen
dc.subjectOviposition site cueen
dc.subjectReproductionen
dc.subjectRhodeusen
dc.subjectSexual conflicten
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleSex differences in the responses to oviposition site cues by a fish revealed by tests with an artificial hosten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.02.011
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-03-17


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record