Show simple item record

Files in this item

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBörger, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorBöhnke-Henrichs, Anne
dc.contributor.authorHattam, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorPiwowarczyk, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorSchasfoort, Femke
dc.contributor.authorAusten, Melanie C.
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-09T00:33:12Z
dc.date.available2018-03-09T00:33:12Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-05
dc.identifier.citationBörger , T , Böhnke-Henrichs , A , Hattam , C , Piwowarczyk , J , Schasfoort , F & Austen , M C 2018 , ' The role of interdisciplinary collaboration for stated preference methods to value marine environmental goods and ecosystem services ' Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science , vol. 201 , pp. 140-151 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.03.009en
dc.identifier.issn0272-7714
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 249327513
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: a530b6fc-d630-4184-ab43-c88338faebf4
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:FF652C27B12405EE13AC527DB692CE06
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85014792804
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/12884
dc.descriptionThis study was funded by the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) within the Ocean of Tomorrow call under Grant Agreement No.266445 for the project Vectors of Change in Oceans and Seas Marine Life, Impact on Economic Sectors (VECTORS).en
dc.description.abstractWith the increasing use of environmental valuation methods in coastal, marine and deep-sea settings, there is a growing need for the collaboration of natural scientists and environmental economists. Stated preference valuation methods in particular need to be based on sound natural science information and translate such information to be used in social surveys. This paper uses three applications to make explicit the flow of information between different disciplines in the preparation and implementation of stated preference studies. One approach for facilitating this flow is to increase knowledge and understanding of natural scientists on these methods. To address this, this paper highlights key opportunities and pitfalls and demonstrates those in the context of three case studies. It therefore provides guidance on stated preference valuation for natural scientists rather than for economists.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Scienceen
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.03.009en
dc.subjectMarine ecosystemsen
dc.subjectEnvironmental valuationen
dc.subjectStated preference methodsen
dc.subjectDiscrete choice experimentsen
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectGC Oceanographyen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.subject.lccGCen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleThe role of interdisciplinary collaboration for stated preference methods to value marine environmental goods and ecosystem servicesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.03.009
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil08-03-20


The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record