Files in this item
Statistical issues in first-in-human studies on BIA 10-2474: neglected comparison of protocol against practice
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Bird, Sheila M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bailey, Rosemary A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Grieve, Andrew P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Senn, Stephen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-17T00:33:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-17T00:33:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-03-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bird , S M , Bailey , R A , Grieve , A P & Senn , S 2017 , ' Statistical issues in first-in-human studies on BIA 10-2474: neglected comparison of protocol against practice ' , Pharmaceutical Statistics , vol. 16 , no. 2 , pp. 100-106 . https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1801 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1539-1604 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 248865261 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: c7ae25c2-07b9-4d53-bea7-473defad7252 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 85013302167 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-8990-2099/work/39600087 | |
dc.identifier.other | WOS: 000398057100001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10023/12740 | |
dc.description | Funding information: European Union's FP7 programme, Grant/Award Number: 602552 | en |
dc.description.abstract | By setting the regulatory-approved protocol for a suite of first-in-human studies on BIA 10-2474 against the subsequent French investigations, we highlight six key design and statistical issues which reinforce recommendations by a Royal Statistical Society Working Party which were made in the aftermath of cytokine release storm in six healthy volunteers in the UK in 2006. The 6 issues are dose determination, availability of pharmacokinetic results, dosing interval, stopping rules, appraisal by safety committee, and clear algorithm required if combining approvals for single and multiple ascending dose studies. | |
dc.format.extent | 7 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Pharmaceutical Statistics | en |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1801 | en |
dc.subject | BIAL 10-2474 | en |
dc.subject | Protocol | en |
dc.subject | Design | en |
dc.subject | Statistical issues | en |
dc.subject | Combined approvals | en |
dc.subject | HA Statistics | en |
dc.subject | QA Mathematics | en |
dc.subject | RS Pharmacy and materia medica | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject | SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being | en |
dc.subject.lcc | HA | en |
dc.subject.lcc | QA | en |
dc.subject.lcc | RS | en |
dc.title | Statistical issues in first-in-human studies on BIA 10-2474: neglected comparison of protocol against practice | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.description.version | Postprint | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Statistics | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Computational Algebra | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1801 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.date.embargoedUntil | 2018-02-16 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.