Comparative evaluation of a novel solar powered low cost ophthalmoscope (Arclight) by eye healthcare workers in Malawi
MetadataShow full item record
This study compared a novel low-cost solar powered direct ophthalmoscope called the Arclight with a traditional direct ophthalmoscope (TDO). After appropriate training, 25 Malawian eye healthcare workers were asked to examine 12 retinal images placed in a teaching manikin head with both the Arclight ophthalmoscope and a traditional direct ophthalmoscope (Keeler Professional V.2.8). Participants were scored on their ability to identify clinical signs, to make a diagnosis and how long they took to make a diagnosis. They were also asked to score each ophthalmoscope for ‘ease of use’. Statistically significant differences were found in favour of the Arclight in the number of clinical signs identified, correct diagnoses made and ease of use. The ophthalmoscopes were equally effective as a screening tool for diabetic retinopathy, and there was no statistically difference in time to diagnosis. The authors conclude that the Arclight offers an easy to use, low cost alternative to the traditional direct ophthalmoscope to meet the demands for screening and diagnosis of visually impairing eye disorders in low-income and middle-income countries.
Blundell , R , Roberts , D , Fioratou , E , Abraham , C , Msosa , J , Chirambo , T & Blaikie , A 2018 , ' Comparative evaluation of a novel solar powered low cost ophthalmoscope (Arclight) by eye healthcare workers in Malawi ' BMJ Innovations , vol Online First , 6 . DOI: 10.1136/ bmjinnov-2017-000225
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
DescriptionThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.