St Andrews Research Repository

View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Cross-cultural differences in adult Theory of Mind abilities : a comparison of native-English speakers and native-Chinese speakers on the self/other differentiation task

View/Open
Jentzsch_2017_TQJoEP_AdultTheoryMindAbilities_AAM.pdf (1023.Kb)
Date
10/02/2018
Author
Bradford, Elisabeth E.F.
Jentzsch, Ines
Gomez, Juan-Carlos
Chen, Yulu
Zhang, Da
Su, Yanjie
Keywords
Theory of Mind
Cross-cultural
Perspective-taking
False-belief
Social cognition
BF Psychology
NDAS
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Theory of Mind (ToM) refers to the ability to compute and attribute mental states to ourselves and other people. It is currently unclear whether ToM abilities are universal or whether they can be culturally influenced. To address this question, this research explored potential differences in engagement of ToM processes between two different cultures, Western (individualist) and Chinese (collectivist), using a sample of healthy adults. Participants completed a computerized false-belief task, in which they attributed beliefs to either themselves or another person, in a matched design, allowing direct comparison between ‘Self’ and ‘Other’ oriented conditions. Results revealed that both native-English speakers and native-Chinese individuals responded significantly faster to selforiented than other-oriented questions. Results also showed that when a trial required a ‘perspective-shift’, participants from both cultures were slower to shift from Self-to-Other than from Other-to-Self. Results indicate that, despite differences in collectivism scores, culture does not influence task-performance, with similar results found for both Western and non-Western participants, suggesting core and potentially universal similarities in the ToM mechanism across these two cultures.
Citation
Bradford , E E F , Jentzsch , I , Gomez , J-C , Chen , Y , Zhang , D & Su , Y 2018 , ' Cross-cultural differences in adult Theory of Mind abilities : a comparison of native-English speakers and native-Chinese speakers on the self/other differentiation task ' The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , vol Online First . DOI: 10.1177/1747021818757170
Publication
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Status
Peer reviewed
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021818757170
ISSN
1747-0218
Type
Journal article
Rights
© 2018 the Authors. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818757170
Description
This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [grant number ES/J500136/1] in the form of a three-year PhD studentship and an Overseas Institutional Visit Grant awarded to Elisabeth Bradford.
Collections
  • Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciences Research
  • Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution Research
  • Psychology & Neuroscience Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/12599

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via PURE, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter