Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBallester, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorHuertas, Florentino
dc.contributor.authorUji, Makoto
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Simon
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-09T10:30:24Z
dc.date.available2018-01-09T10:30:24Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-20
dc.identifier.citationBallester , R , Huertas , F , Uji , M & Bennett , S 2017 , ' Stroboscopic vision and sustained attention during coincidence-anticipation ' , Scientific Reports , vol. 7 , 17898 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18092-5en
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252005727
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 079efcfd-0083-411b-8d78-db8f8bcc8950
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85038635635
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9445-6353/work/40535304
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/12445
dc.descriptionThis research was supported by a Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Cultura (https://sede.educacion.gob.es) predoctoral grant (FPU13-05605) to R.B and project research grants: Junta de Andalucia Proyecto de Excelencia (SEJ-6414), Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (PSI2013-46385) to FH.en
dc.description.abstractWe compared coincidence-anticipation performance in normal vision and stroboscopic vision as a function of time-on-task. Participants estimated the arrival time of a real object that moved with constant acceleration (−0.7, 0, +0.7 m/s2) in a pseudo-randomised order across 4 blocks of 30 trials in both vision conditions, received in a counter-balanced order. Participants (n = 20) became more errorful (accuracy and variability) in the normal vision condition as a function of time-on-task, whereas performance was maintained in the stroboscopic vision condition. We interpret these data as showing that participants failed to maintain coincidence-anticipation performance in the normal vision condition due to monotony and attentional underload. In contrast, the stroboscopic vision condition placed a greater demand on visual-spatial memory for motion extrapolation, and thus participants did not experience the typical vigilance decrement in performance. While short-term adaptation effects from practicing in stroboscopic vision are promising, future work needs to consider for how long participants can maintain effortful processing, and whether there are negative carry-over effects from cognitive fatigue when transferring to normal vision.
dc.format.extent7
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reportsen
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2017. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleStroboscopic vision and sustained attention during coincidence-anticipationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18092-5
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record