Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBurdett, Emily Rachel Reed
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Justin L
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-01T00:31:37Z
dc.date.available2018-01-01T00:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.citationBurdett , E R R & Barrett , J L 2016 , ' The circle of life : a cross-cultural comparison of children's attribution of life-cycle traits ' , British Journal of Developmental Psychology , vol. 34 , no. 2 , pp. 276-290 . https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12131en
dc.identifier.issn0261-510X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 240223846
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 4ad2cbc0-2a4e-4669-9be1-f92d0ed7db51
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84953260280
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000375765700009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/12400
dc.descriptionThis research was supported in part by grant 12682 from the John Templeton Foundation.en
dc.description.abstractDo children attribute mortality and other life-cycle traits to all minded beings? The present study examined whether culture influences young children's ability to conceptualize and differentiate human beings from supernatural beings (such as God) in terms of life-cycle traits. Three-to-5-year-old Israeli and British children were questioned whether their mother, a friend, and God would be subject to various life-cycle processes: Birth, death, ageing, existence/longevity, and parentage. Children did not anthropomorphize but differentiated among human and supernatural beings, attributing life-cycle traits to humans, but not to God. Although 3-year-olds differentiated significantly among agents, 5-year-olds attributed correct life-cycle traits more consistently than younger children. The results also indicated some cross-cultural variation in these attributions. Implications for biological conceptual development are discussed.
dc.format.extent15
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Developmental Psychologyen
dc.rights© 2015 The British Psychological Society. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12131en
dc.subjectCognitive developmenten
dc.subjectFolk biologyen
dc.subjectCultural learningen
dc.subjectCross-cultural comparisonsen
dc.subjectNaïve biologyen
dc.subjectReasoningen
dc.subjectAnthropomorphismen
dc.subjectRC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatryen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccRC0321en
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleThe circle of life : a cross-cultural comparison of children's attribution of life-cycle traitsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12131
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-12-31


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record