Subsurface activities and decision support systems : an analysis of the requirements for a social acceptance-motivated decision support system
MetadataShow full item record
In this paper, we present a novel perspective on evaluating subsurface activities by increasing the role of social acceptance in the decision-making process. We use the triangle of social acceptance to structure and analyze the decision-making problem in three classes: social–political, market, and community acceptance. This allows the inclusion of strategic and social concerns, beside economical and environmental aspects in the evaluation of subsurface activities. We analyze the requirements of a decision support system for each class according to three aspects: the requirements originating from the context, the requirements derived from the decision-making process, and the extent to which the decision support system can fulfill these requirements. Furthermore, we identify the mechanisms that shape and govern the interactions between the requirements and limitations that result from the context and decision-making process of subsurface activities. We conclude that the requirements of a decision support system for subsurface activities are very different for each class of social acceptance. In addition, we find that several aspects need to be included in an earlier phase of the decision-making process for subsurface activities.
van Os , H W A , Herber , R & Scholtens , B 2016 , ' Subsurface activities and decision support systems : an analysis of the requirements for a social acceptance-motivated decision support system ' , Environmental Impact Assessment Review , vol. 60 , pp. 176-185 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.002
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.002
DescriptionWe thank the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs for the funding of our research and the complete freedom for executing our research.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.