Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorProsser, Simon James
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-11T00:31:41Z
dc.date.available2017-12-11T00:31:41Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-01
dc.identifier199203794
dc.identifiere3eb93a0-1227-4c33-900c-005bf15d0b94
dc.identifier84953864580
dc.identifier.citationProsser , S J 2015 , ' XII - Why are indexicals essential? ' , Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , vol. 115 , no. 3 pt 3 , pp. 211-233 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2015.00392.xen
dc.identifier.issn0066-7374
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7444-2782/work/67525834
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/12307
dc.description.abstractDespite recent challenges, it is commonly held that certain indexical terms such as ‘I', ‘here’ and ‘now’ have a necessary or ‘essential’ role in certain kinds of action. I argue that this is correct, and I offer an explanation. A use of an indexical term of the kind in question connotes a specific relation between the thinking subject and the reference of the indexical. The mental representation of this relation has an epistemic feature that I call first-person redundancy. I show through a regress argument that a mental state of this kind is essential for common kinds of action, and perhaps for all actions.
dc.format.extent205003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the Aristotelian Societyen
dc.subjectB Philosophy. Psychology. Religionen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subjectR2Cen
dc.subject.lccBen
dc.titleXII - Why are indexicals essential?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9264.2015.00392.x
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-12-10


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record