Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHawley, Katherine Jane
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-16T10:30:06Z
dc.date.available2017-11-16T10:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.identifier.citationHawley , K J 2018 , ' Almost identical, almost innocent ' , Philosophy , vol. 82 , pp. 249-263 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246118000097en
dc.identifier.issn0031-8191
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 251051003
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 7a7c34ad-049c-44a9-8f20-42678690327a
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8179-2550/work/53214469
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/12112
dc.description.abstractIn his 1991 book, Parts of Classes, David Lewis discusses the idea that composition is identity, alongside the idea that mereological overlap is a form of partial identity. But this notion of partial identity does nothing to help Lewis achieve his goals in that book. So why does he mention it? I explore and resolve this puzzle, by comparing Parts of Classes with Lewis’s invocation of partial identity in his 1993 paper ‘Many But Almost One’, where he uses it to address Unger’s problem of the many. I raise some concerns about this way of thinking of partial identity, but conclude that, for Lewis, it is an important defence against accusations of ontological profligacy.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophyen
dc.rights© The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2018. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246118000097en
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleAlmost identical, almost innocenten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.St Andrews Centre for Exoplanet Scienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246118000097
dc.description.statusNon peer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-11-16


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record