Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Mark
dc.contributor.authorO'Hare, Bernadette Ann-Marie
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-11T06:30:09Z
dc.date.available2017-11-11T06:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-10
dc.identifier.citationCurtis , M & O'Hare , B A-M 2017 ' Lost revenues in low income countries ' pp. 1-27 . < http://curtisresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/Lost-revenues.pdf >en
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 250642309
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 99eda7ae-2c7d-4864-b976-3176c4c05bec
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/12057
dc.description.abstractThis research estimates how much revenue six low income countries – of which five are in sub Saharan Africa - are losing unnecessarily from various potential revenue streams that could be used to fund public services. In recent years, increased attention has been paid to government revenues lost to tax evasion and to tax incentives given to corporations. However, few attempts have been made to estimate losses for a larger number of potential revenue streams. This task is critical given the massive under-funding of public services, and the extent of need, in Low Income Countries. Developing countries can lose revenue in a variety of ways. Here we estimate how much is being lost from the following sources: Corporate tax avoidance by multinational companies Providing tax incentives (for example, reductions or exemptions from the payment of corporate taxes) which constitute government ‘tax expenditure’ Not collecting taxes from a proportion of business activity in the informal sector Corruption in the national budget Debt interest payments to international creditors. The responsibility for these revenue losses lies partly with foreign and partly with domestic actors. Multinational companies are depriving governments of revenues by failing to pay fair taxes. Many companies also receive tax incentives, which reduces their tax payments to governments still further. Governments could themselves be doing much more to stop the leakage of revenues. They could do much more to tax parts of the currently informal sector, which often comprise businesses operating under the radar of the tax authorities but which should pay their fair share of taxes. They must also do more to prevent corruption in the budget, which means that a proportion of public money allocated to support public services is often simply lost in the system somewhere. Both foreign and domestic actors need to ensure that low income countries are also paying back a fair proportion of the debt interest they owe, but no more than that.
dc.format.extent27
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofen
dc.rightsCopyright the Authors, 2017.en
dc.subjectHB Economic Theoryen
dc.subjectR Medicineen
dc.subjectSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutionsen
dc.subject.lccHBen
dc.subject.lccRen
dc.titleLost revenues in low income countriesen
dc.typeWorking or discussion paperen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Global Health Implementation Groupen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Infection and Global Health Divisionen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://curtisresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/Lost-revenues.pdfen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record