Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWardle, Huon
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-07T10:39:11Z
dc.date.available2017-11-07T10:39:11Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-28
dc.identifier250912476
dc.identifierecc8919c-b747-41a2-a982-24d5776893bd
dc.identifier.citationWardle , H 2017 , ' Testing freedom : ontological considerations ' , etnofoor , vol. 29 , no. 1 , 1 , pp. 11-27 . < http://www.jstor.org/stable/44318092 >en
dc.identifier.issn0921-5158
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7179-8289/work/64034061
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/12015
dc.description.abstractWho or what can be free, or not free? The question may seem mind-boggling on close inspection. To the extent that meaning is defined through reference, or acts of naming, different meanings of freedom deployed in daily life derive their significance from specific and contingent instructions that allow the particularities of freedom to be constituted. So we must begin by exposing ourselves to what Malinowski called the ‘universe of semantic chaos’ in which ‘freedom’ appears if we are to hope to approach freedom itself (1947). Further, this article argues that in order to address the complexities of freedom to their limits, an exploration not only of semantics (considerations of meaning) but also of its relation to ontology (considerations of existence) cannot be neglected.
dc.format.extent178143
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofetnofooren
dc.subjectGN Anthropologyen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccGNen
dc.titleTesting freedom : ontological considerationsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Social Anthropologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Cosmopolitan Studiesen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/44318092en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record