Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorPicard, Alejandra Morales
dc.contributor.authorHogan, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorLambert, Megan L.
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Anna
dc.contributor.authorSeed, Amanda Madeleine
dc.contributor.authorSlocombe, Katie
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T23:31:54Z
dc.date.available2017-10-26T23:31:54Z
dc.date.issued2017-03
dc.identifier.citationPicard , A M , Hogan , L , Lambert , M L , Wilkinson , A , Seed , A M & Slocombe , K 2017 , ' Diffusion of novel foraging behaviour in Amazon parrots through social learning ' , Animal Cognition , vol. 20 , no. 2 , pp. 285-298 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1049-3en
dc.identifier.issn1435-9448
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 248157001
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: fdb21624-b850-445a-8376-c02e5e1326db
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000394313400015
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84992417323
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000394313400015
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3867-3003/work/60426877
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/11931
dc.descriptionThis research was supported by The British Psychological Society Summer Bursary, awarded to Lauren Hogan.en
dc.description.abstractWhile social learning has been demonstrated in species across many taxa, the role it plays in everyday foraging decisions is not well understood. Investigating social learning during foraging could shed light on the emergence of cultural variation in different groups. We used an open diffusion experiment to examine the spread of a novel foraging technique in captive Amazon parrots. Three groups were tested using a two-action foraging box, including experimental groups exposed to demonstrators using different techniques and control birds. We also examined the influence of agonistic and pilfering behaviour on task acquisition. We found evidence of social learning: more experimental birds than control birds interacted with and opened the box. The birds were, however, no more likely to use the demonstrated technique than the non-demonstrated one, making local or stimulus enhancement the most likely mechanism. Exhibiting aggression was positively correlated with box opening, whilst receiving aggression did not reduce motivation to engage with the box, indicating that willingness to defend access to the box was important in task acquisition. Pilfering food and success in opening the box were also positively correlated; however, having food pilfered did not affect victims’ motivation to interact with the box. In a group context, pilfering may promote learning of new foraging opportunities. Although previous studies have demonstrated that psittacines are capable of imitation, in this naturalistic set-up there was no evidence that parrots copied the demonstrated opening technique. Foraging behaviour in wild populations of Amazons could therefore be facilitated by low-fidelity social learning mechanisms.
dc.format.extent14
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Cognitionen
dc.rightsCopyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1049-3en
dc.subjectSocial learningen
dc.subjectOpen diffusionen
dc.subjectTwo-action testen
dc.subjectAmazona amazonicaen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectQL Zoologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.subject.lccQLen
dc.titleDiffusion of novel foraging behaviour in Amazon parrots through social learningen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.‘Living Links to Human Evolution’ Research Centreen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1049-3
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-10-26


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record