Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSchild, Kristin M.
dc.contributor.authorHawley, Robert L.
dc.contributor.authorChipman, Jonathan W.
dc.contributor.authorBenn, Douglas I.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T14:30:25Z
dc.date.available2017-10-26T14:30:25Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-02
dc.identifier251437049
dc.identifier8a183a44-aebd-4968-93b1-8ad02d0709aa
dc.identifier85051952384
dc.identifier000412545900021
dc.identifier.citationSchild , K M , Hawley , R L , Chipman , J W & Benn , D I 2017 , ' Quantifying suspended sediment concentration in subglacial sediment plumes discharging from two Svalbard tidewater glaciers using Landsat-8 and in situ measurements ' , International Journal of Remote Sensing , vol. 38 , no. 23 , pp. 6865-6881 . https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1365388en
dc.identifier.issn0143-1161
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:3473907316AF0511203F817108433B20
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3604-0886/work/64697381
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/11926
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by National Science Foundation IGERT award: [Grant Number DGE-0801490]; National Science Foundation GK-12 award: [Grant Number DGE-0947790]; NASA supplement award: [Grant Number NNX10AG22G]; American Alpine Club under their Research Grant; Geological Society of America under their Research Grant; the ConocoPhillips-Ludin Northern Area Program under the CRIOS project (Calving Rates and Impact on Sea Level); and Dartmouth Earth Sciences Department.en
dc.description.abstractMarine-terminating outlet glaciers discharge mass through iceberg calving, submarine melting, and meltwater run-off. While calving can be quantified by in situ and remote-sensing observations, meltwater run-off, the subglacial transport of meltwater, and submarine melting are not well constrained due to inherent difficulties observing the subglacial and proglacial environments at tidewater glaciers. Remote-sensing and in situ measurements of surface sediment plumes, and their suspended sediment concentration (SSC), have been used as a proxy for glacier meltwater run-off. However, this relationship between satellite reflectance and SSC has predominantly been established using land-terminating glaciers. Here, we use two Svalbard tidewater glaciers to establish a well-constrained relationship between Landsat-8 surface reflecance and SSC and argue that it can be used to measure relative meltwater run-off at tidewater glaciers throughout a summer melt season. We find the highest correlation between SSCs and Landsat-8 surface reflectance by using the red + NIR band combination (r2 = 0.76). The highest correlation between SSCs and in situ field spectrometer measurements is in the 740-800 nm wavelength range (r2 = 0.85), a spectral range not currently measured by Landsat. Additionally, we find that in situ and Landsat-8 measurements for surface reflectance of SSCs are not interchangeable and therefore establish a relationship for each detection method. We then use the Landsat-8 relationship to calculate total surface sediment load, finding a strong correlation between total surface sediment load and a proxy for meltwater run-off (r2 ≥ 0.89). Our results establish a new metric to calculate SSCs from Landsat-8 surface reflectance and demonstrate how the SSC of subglacial sediment plumes can be used to monitor relative seasonal meltwater discharge at tidewater glaciers.
dc.format.extent17
dc.format.extent2706133
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Remote Sensingen
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectGB Physical geographyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 14 - Life Below Wateren
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.subject.lccGBen
dc.titleQuantifying suspended sediment concentration in subglacial sediment plumes discharging from two Svalbard tidewater glaciers using Landsat-8 and in situ measurementsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Instituteen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01431161.2017.1365388
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record