The emergence of a lumpen-consumerate : the aesthetics of consumption and violence in the English riots of 2011
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Within hours of the outset of unrest in the August 2011 English Riots, the government asserted that they were the doings of “criminal gangs”. In doing so, government officials and journalistic commentators cited television images of rioting and plundering youths. Although this assertion was subsequently abandoned, it reflected an on-going process: the criminalization of youth in Britain. The recycled images of flames and hooded teenagers came to serve as the proof of youth “gone bad”. This paper explores both the actions supposedly captured in the images depicting the riots and the discourses surrounding the reproduction of those images. It seeks to connect the youth politics of the everyday—especially the problems of being ignored as political subjects—to the formal political structures that rely on youth to be socially unruly on one hand and disciplined consumers on the other. Segments of British youth are cast out, seen as unneeded or unwanted in this disciplinary project and constitute what I call here a “lumpen-consumerate”. The paper concludes with a comparative analysis of the consumer images that both discipline young people and serve as a model for framing the unrest. The paper builds upon Deleuze, Badiou, Bourdieu, Bauman and others in order to examine how spontaneous, uncoordinated action came to be read through mass media spectacle as dismissible and intolerable images of “criminal gangs” to be policed.
Murer , J S 2015 , ' The emergence of a lumpen-consumerate : the aesthetics of consumption and violence in the English riots of 2011 ' , International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society , vol. 28 , no. 2 , pp. 161-178 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-014-9187-6
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society
© 2014, Springer Science+Business New Media New York. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-014-9187-6
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.