Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorFederspiel, Ira G.
dc.contributor.authorGarland, Alexis
dc.contributor.authorGuez, David
dc.contributor.authorBugynar, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHealy, Susan D.
dc.contributor.authorGüntürkün, Onur
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, Andrea S.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-24T23:31:47Z
dc.date.available2017-10-24T23:31:47Z
dc.date.issued2017-01
dc.identifier.citationFederspiel , I G , Garland , A , Guez , D , Bugynar , T , Healy , S D , Güntürkün , O & Griffin , A S 2017 , ' Adjusting foraging strategies : a comparison of rural and urban common mynas ( Acridotheres tristis ) ' , Animal Cognition , vol. 20 , no. 1 , pp. 65-74 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1045-7en
dc.identifier.issn1435-9448
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 247345876
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 19504811-abdd-49e1-9509-c130d49f2bb4
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84992196000
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8059-4480/work/60631286
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000394312700008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/11914
dc.descriptionThe research was funded by a FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IRSES research staff exchange grant to TB, SH, OG and ASG. OG was additionally supported by Gu227/16-1 and IF by an FWF grant (Y366-B17) to TB.en
dc.description.abstractEstablishment in urbanized environments is associated with changes in physiology, behaviour, and problem-solving. We compared the speed of learning in urban and rural female common mynas, Acridotheres tristis, using a standard visual discrimination task followed by a reversal learning phase. We also examined how quickly each bird progressed through different stages of learning, including sampling and acquisition within both initial and reversal learning, and persistence following reversal. Based on their reliance on very different food resources, we expected urban mynas to learn and reversal learn more quickly but to sample new contingencies for proportionately longer before learning them. When quantified from first presentation to criterion achievement, urban mynas took more 20-trial blocks to learn the initial discrimination, as well as the reversed contingency, than rural mynas. More detailed analyses at the level of stage revealed that this was because urban mynas explored the novel cue-outcome contingencies for longer, and despite transitioning faster through subsequent acquisition, remained overall slower than rural females. Our findings draw attention to fine adjustments in learning strategies in response to urbanization and caution against interpreting the speed to learn a task as a reflection of cognitive ability.
dc.format.extent10
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Cognitionen
dc.rights© 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at link.springer.com / https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1045-7en
dc.subjectBehavioural flexibilityen
dc.subjectDiscrimination learningen
dc.subjectIndian mynaen
dc.subjectReversal learningen
dc.subjectRural birdsen
dc.subjectUrbanisationen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematicsen
dc.subjectExperimental and Cognitive Psychologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communitiesen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleAdjusting foraging strategies : a comparison of rural and urban common mynas (Acridotheres tristis)en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Commissionen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1045-7
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-10-24
dc.identifier.grantnumberen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record