Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorGlennie, Richard
dc.contributor.authorBorchers, David L.
dc.contributor.authorMurchie, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorHarmsen, Bart J.
dc.contributor.authorFoster, Rebecca J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-29T11:30:08Z
dc.date.available2017-09-29T11:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.identifier251041104
dc.identifier7c8ad57b-8fc2-427b-b8aa-25ae8e76d5a1
dc.identifier85068602233
dc.identifier000478479800001
dc.identifier85068602233
dc.identifier31045249
dc.identifier.citationGlennie , R , Borchers , D L , Murchie , M , Harmsen , B J & Foster , R J 2019 , ' Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recapture ' , Biometrics , vol. 75 , no. 4 , pp. 1345-1355 . https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13078en
dc.identifier.issn0006-341X
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3806-4280/work/60196539
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3944-0754/work/72842462
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/11758
dc.descriptionFunding: Part-funded by UK EPSRC grant EP/K041061/1 (DB); Richard Glennie was funded by the Carnegie Trust.en
dc.description.abstractOpen population capture‐recapture models are widely used to estimate population demographics and abundance over time. Bayesian methods exist to incorporate open population modeling with spatial capture‐recapture (SCR), allowing for estimation of the effective area sampled and population density. Here, open population SCR is formulated as a hidden Markov model (HMM), allowing inference by maximum likelihood for both Cormack‐Jolly‐Seber and Jolly‐Seber models, with and without activity center movement. The method is applied to a 12‐year survey of male jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary, Belize, to estimate survival probability and population abundance over time. For this application, inference is shown to be biased when assuming activity centers are fixed over time, while including a model for activity center movement provides negligible bias and nominal confidence interval coverage, as demonstrated by a simulation study. The HMM approach is compared with Bayesian data augmentation and closed population models for this application. The method is substantially more computationally efficient than the Bayesian approach and provides a lower root‐mean‐square error in predicting population density compared to closed population models.
dc.format.extent11
dc.format.extent1005399
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBiometricsen
dc.subjectHidden Markov modelen
dc.subjectOpen populationen
dc.subjectPanthera oncaen
dc.subjectPopulation densityen
dc.subjectSpatial capture-recaptureen
dc.subjectSurvivalen
dc.subjectQA Mathematicsen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciences(all)en
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)en
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiology(all)en
dc.subjectApplied Mathematicsen
dc.subjectStatistics and Probabilityen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleOpen population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recaptureen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorEPSRCen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Statisticsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Mathematics and Statisticsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/biom.13078
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-07-25
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/K041061/1en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record