Files in this item
Inference from randomized (factorial) experiments
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Bailey, Rosemary Anne | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-04T10:30:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-04T10:30:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier | 248065490 | |
dc.identifier | ce953096-1f70-41b3-80d6-fc5df4d83f83 | |
dc.identifier | 85028615415 | |
dc.identifier | 000409254500004 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bailey , R A 2017 , ' Inference from randomized (factorial) experiments ' , Statistical Science , vol. 32 , no. 3 , pp. 352-355 . https://doi.org/10.1214/16-STS600 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0883-4237 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-8990-2099/work/39600088 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/11606 | |
dc.description.abstract | This is a contribution to the discussion of the interesting paper by Ding [Statist. Sci. 32 (2017) 331–345], which contrasts approaches attributed to Neyman and Fisher. I believe that Fisher’s usual assumption was unit-treatment additivity, rather than the “sharp null hypothesis” attributed to him. Fisher also developed the notion of interaction in factorial experiments. His explanation leads directly to the concept of marginality, which is essential for the interpretation of data from any factorial experiment. | |
dc.format.extent | 4 | |
dc.format.extent | 100187 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Statistical Science | en |
dc.subject | Factorial design | en |
dc.subject | Marginality | en |
dc.subject | Randomization | en |
dc.subject | Unit-treatment additivity | en |
dc.subject | HA Statistics | en |
dc.subject | QA Mathematics | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject.lcc | HA | en |
dc.subject.lcc | QA | en |
dc.title | Inference from randomized (factorial) experiments | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Statistics | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Computational Algebra | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1214/16-STS600 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.