Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorAshford, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.advisorHarris, James A. (James Anthony)
dc.contributor.authorMildenberger, Carl David
dc.coverage.spatialxi, 223 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-04T09:40:31Z
dc.date.available2017-09-04T09:40:31Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/11605
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this thesis is to present a conception of commutative justice. Commutative justice is defined as that part of justice in transfer (as opposed to justice in acquisition as well as distributive or rectificatory justice), which deals with transferring goods via market exchanges. Thus, this thesis examines which conditions a market exchange has to fulfil in order to be called just. Whereas traditionally speaking conditions like non-coercion or non-deception have received most attention – i.e. conditions focusing on the act of exchanging itself – the thesis’ focus is a different one. It argues that we necessarily also have to take into account the consequences of a certain market exchange in order to judge whether it is just. Therefore, the thesis proceeds to analyze how problematic market outcomes like externalities, the formation of monopolies, violations of the Lockean proviso, inequality, and commodification affect the justice of the market exchanges which gave rise to them. The thesis finds that we need to broaden our conception of commutative justice – but only a little. Whereas the issues of externalities, violations of the Lockean proviso, and inequalities do not affect whether a certain market exchange is just, monopolization and commodification do. In order to be commutatively just, a market exchange must not only fulfil the traditional conditions of non-coercion, non-deception, etc., but it also must not bring about certain forms of monopoly nor further certain kinds of commodification. This conclusion leaves open the idea that, say, inequality or externalities could be relevant to distributive justice if not commutative justice.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectJustice in exchangeen_US
dc.subjectMarketsen_US
dc.subjectEconomic justiceen_US
dc.subjectDistributive justiceen_US
dc.subject.lccHB72.M5
dc.subject.lcshExchange--Philosophyen
dc.subject.lcshMarkets--Philosophyen
dc.subject.lcshJustice--Economic aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshDistributive justiceen
dc.titleCommutative justiceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorSt Andrews and Stirling Graduate Programme in Philosophy (SASP)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.publisher.departmentUniversity of Stirlingen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2021-09-26
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 26th September 2021en


The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record