Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSaab, Rim
dc.contributor.authorTausch, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorSpears, Russell
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Wing
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-01T23:31:50Z
dc.date.available2017-09-01T23:31:50Z
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.identifier.citationSaab , R , Tausch , N , Spears , R & Cheung , W 2015 , ' Acting in solidarity: testing an extended dual-pathway model of collective action by bystander group members ' , British Journal of Social Psychology , vol. 54 , no. 3 , pp. 539-560 . https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12095en
dc.identifier.issn0144-6665
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 150587047
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 99c1b041-31e7-4612-86f5-a220d1e3706e
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84941026638
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9471-0673/work/46362111
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000361218000008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/11595
dc.description.abstractWe examined predictors of collective action among bystander group members in solidarity with a disadvantaged group by extending the dual pathway model of collective action, which proposes one efficacy-based and one emotion-based path to collective action (van Zomeren, Spears, Fischer, & Leach, 2004). Based on two proposed functions of social identity performance (Klein, Spears, & Reicher, 2007), we distinguished between the efficacy of collective action at consolidating the identity of a protest movement and its efficacy at achieving social change (political efficacy). We expected identity consolidation efficacy to positively predict collective action tendencies directly and indirectly via political efficacy. We also expected collective action tendencies to be positively predicted by moral outrage and by sympathy in response to disadvantaged outgroup’s suffering. These hypotheses were supported in two surveys examining intentions to protest for Palestine in Britain (Study 1), and intentions to attend the June 4th vigil in Hong Kong to commemorate the Tiananmen massacre among a sample of Hong Kong citizens (Study 2). The contributions of these findings to research on the dual pathway model of collective action and the different functions of collective action are discussed.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Social Psychologyen
dc.rights© 2015 The British Psychological Society. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12095en
dc.subjectEfficacyen
dc.subjectCollective actionen
dc.subjectIdentity consolidationen
dc.subjectSolidarityen
dc.subjectBystander groupen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleActing in solidarity: testing an extended dual-pathway model of collective action by bystander group membersen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12095
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-09-01


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record