Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBlackwood, Leda
dc.contributor.authorHopkins, Nick
dc.contributor.authorReicher, Stephen
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-30T23:33:06Z
dc.date.available2017-07-30T23:33:06Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifier.citationBlackwood , L , Hopkins , N & Reicher , S 2016 , ' From theorizing radicalization to surveillance practices : Muslims in the cross hairs of scrutiny ' , Political Psychology , vol. 37 , no. 5 , pp. 597-612 . https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12284en
dc.identifier.issn0162-895X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 207756005
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 633be2eb-b3a4-4a54-a953-07c490c7cb15
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84988037357
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000384625100002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/11326
dc.descriptionThis research was funded by the Leverhulme Trust and the Scottish Institute of Policing Research.en
dc.description.abstractThere are several psychological analyses of the processes of radicalisation resulting in terrorism. However, we know little about how those in authority (e.g., the police) conceptualise the psychological dynamics to radicalisation. Accordingly, we present a detailed account of an official UK counter-terrorism intervention, the Workshop to Raise Awareness of Prevent, designed to enlist front-line professionals in identifying and referring those at risk of radicalisation. Specifically, we report data gathered during an observation of this intervention delivered by the police in Scotland. This provides insight into the psychological model of radicalisation being disseminated in the UK and we evaluate the merits of this model in the light of current psychological theory. First, we consider how this model may overlook certain social dynamics relevant to understanding radicalisation. Second, we discuss how this neglect limits consideration of how the surveillance warranted by the official model may lead Muslims to disengage from majority group members. Our analysis points to how political psychology’s analysis of social identities and citizenship can inform public policy and practice.
dc.format.extent16
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPolitical Psychologyen
dc.rights© 2015 International Society of Political Psychology. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Blackwood, L., Hopkins, N. and Reicher, S. (2015), From Theorizing Radicalization to Surveillance Practices: Muslims in the Cross Hairs of Scrutiny. Political Psychology, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12284. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.en
dc.subjectTerrorismen
dc.subjectMuslimsen
dc.subjectSurveillanceen
dc.subjectRadicalisationen
dc.subjectDeradicalizationen
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutionsen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleFrom theorizing radicalization to surveillance practices : Muslims in the cross hairs of scrutinyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12284
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-07-30


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record