Anarchism and non-representational theory in the social sciences
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
My hope in this article is to demonstrate some ways in which anarchism is relevant for social science, specifically in a post-representational environment. To do this, I explore some of the productive links between the stance of anarchism and recent work in non-representational theorising in the social sciences (Ingold, 2015; Dewsbury, 2010; Thrift, 2008). By doing so, I do not suggest that non-representational theory has to be anarchist. Rather, I argue that it lends itself strongly to a reconsideration, even a revalorization, of anarchism in the social sciences. Finally, to illustrate this link I will turn in the last section to the sociologist Andrew Pickering (2010) for his thought-provoking exposition of performative, non-representational approaches as a sustainable and viable alternative social ontology.
Smith , T S J 2015 , ' Anarchism and non-representational theory in the social sciences ' E-International Relations . < http://www.e-ir.info/2015/08/07/anarchism-and-non-representational-theory-in-the-social-sciences/ >
© 2015 The author. This is an Open Access article, published under a CC BY-NC Creative Commons licence.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.