Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCrisp, Oliver D.
dc.identifier.citationCrisp , O D 2017 , ' Analytic theology as systematic theology ' , Open Theology , vol. 3 , no. 1 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 250454310
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 08120a2e-2e2d-4d4b-b9f0-c15a7167c218
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:FE79DDF48F902AD485E5EAD4DB7B148E
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85043306427
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000403668700001
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8866-1548/work/71559921
dc.description.abstractIt is often said that analytic theology is not really systematic theology; it is something else entirely. However, specifying what this “something else” amounts to has proven a little more difficult. In this article I argue that analytic theology may be a species of systematic theology. I show that there is no agreed view on the nature of systematic theology amongst several leading practitioners of systematic theology by comparing the work of John Webster, Brian Gerrish, and Gordon Kaufman. I then set out the Shared Task of Systematic Theology (Shared Task), which is a conceptual threshold for systematic theology that reflects the thought of Webster, Gerrish, and Kaufman. With this in mind, I argue that analytic theology can meet this threshold, and count as a version of systematic theology.
dc.relation.ispartofOpen Theologyen
dc.rights© 2017 Oliver D. Crisp. Published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.en
dc.subjectAnalytic theologyen
dc.subjectShared Tasken
dc.subjectSystematic theologyen
dc.subjectBT Doctrinal Theologyen
dc.titleAnalytic theology as systematic theologyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Divinityen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record