Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSlomp, Gabriella
dc.identifier.citationSlomp , G 2016 , ' The inconvenience of the legislator’s two persons and the role of good counsellors ' , Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy , vol. 19 , no. 1 , pp. 68-85 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 231586977
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 48634a80-5317-42d7-9e45-8b964f925262
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84955364313
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000377025800005
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4596-5992/work/76774695
dc.description.abstractI focus on Hobbes’s distinction between the natural and political persons embodied in one sovereign and show that, driven by their passions, ignorance, or bad judgement, rulers qua natural men may undermine the end they ought to pursue qua political actors, namely the protection of the well-being of the people. In particular, as legislators, they may make laws that are unnecessary, or that the people cannot endure, or that give rise to their impatience and discontent. I argue that in Hobbes’s argument, the notion of good counsel provides a safety net against bad commands being issued by rulers. I claim that the process of consultation of good counsellors is an essential component of Hobbes’s understanding of law-making. I suggest that the Hobbesian notions of counsel and counsellor provide a valuable framework to illuminate aspects of contemporary global law-making.
dc.relation.ispartofCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophyen
dc.rights© 2016 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at
dc.subjectNatural personen
dc.subjectpolitical personen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectJX International lawen
dc.titleThe inconvenience of the legislator’s two persons and the role of good counsellorsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of International Relationsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Legal and Constitutional Researchen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Global Law and Governanceen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record