Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorEsler, Philip Francis
dc.contributor.authorMosser, Carl
dc.coverage.spatialvii, 381 leavesen
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-19T12:49:06Z
dc.date.available2017-06-19T12:49:06Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifieruk.bl.ethos.664301
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/11022
dc.description.abstractThe contemporary study of Hebrews is bedeviled by anachronistic assumptions that distort its interpretation. As a result, Hebrews holds a paradoxical position in contemporary New Testament scholarship. After two centuries of critical study little progress has been made on core introductory issues related to this epistle. Consequently, many scholars are hesitant to utilize it significantly for investigation into the origin and early development of Christianity. In contrast, Hebrews specialists generally agree that Hebrews is a sermon that was sent to a group of Christians in Rome. Some scholars even utilize it as a primary datum in the investigation of Roman Christianity. This thesis consists of a ground-clearing exercise and prolegomena for reexamining the place of Hebrews in early Christian history. It begins by arguing that Hebrews should not be read as a document of early Christianity, a religion separate from Judaism, but as a document of Second Temple Judaism. It then assesses the arguments for locating the recipients in Rome. When the evidence is subjected to critical scrutiny we find that it precludes an Italian location. Likewise, the arguments against locating the readers in Palestine fail and the evidence actually points in that direction. Finally, the idea that Hebrews is a sermon is disproved and new insight is gained into the situation that the epistle addresses. Significantly, we find that the reference to a "word of exhortation" in 13:22 refers to an oracle received by the readers which they were hesitant to obey. The positive argument contends that Hebrews was sent to Jerusalem. New exegetical insight into Rahab's commendation (11:31) gives strong support to this contention. Additional support comes from the Temple Scroll, 4QMMT and other Jewish texts which help prove that camp in 13:13-14 is a legal term of art that refers to Jerusalem. These texts also help us see that the "strange teachings" in 13:9 refer to halakhic innovations related to sacrifice. The readers reside in Jerusalem and are urged to leave the city before it is destroyed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subject.lccBS2775.52M7
dc.subject.lcshBible. Hebrews--Criticism, interpretation, etcen
dc.titleNo lasting city : Rome, Jerusalem and the place of Hebrews in the history of earliest 'Christianity'en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record