Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorTorrance, Andrew B.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-15T08:30:11Z
dc.date.available2017-06-15T08:30:11Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-05
dc.identifier.citationTorrance , A B 2017 , ' Attending to the story of Adam, Eve, and the Fall ' , Journal of Analytic Theology , vol. 5 , pp. 601-612 . https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2016-5.001322191404aen
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 246704890
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8355f65d-0870-4ae6-aa08-ca843bf056a8
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5604-8247/work/61133139
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/10998
dc.description.abstractIn response to Hud Hudson's The Fall and Hypertime, I raise the question as to whether it is constructive to to use the story of Adam, Eve, and the Fall to make a specific apologetic point that draws attention to a reading of the story that we would not otherwise want to affirm?
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Analytic Theologyen
dc.rights© 2017 Andrew Torrance © 2017 Journal of Analytic Theology. This work has been made available online with permission from the journal editors. This is the final published version of the work, which was originally published at: https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2016-5.001322191404aen
dc.subjectBS The Bibleen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBSen
dc.titleAttending to the story of Adam, Eve, and the Fallen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Divinityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2016-5.001322191404a
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journalofanalytictheology.com/jat/index.php/jat/article/view/162/380en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record