Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMankoff, Kenneth D.
dc.contributor.authorGulley, Jason D.
dc.contributor.authorTulaczyk, Slawek M.
dc.contributor.authorCovington, Matthew D.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xiaofeng
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yunxiang
dc.contributor.authorBenn, Douglas I.
dc.contributor.authorGŁowacki, Piotr S.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-07T14:30:09Z
dc.date.available2017-06-07T14:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.identifier.citationMankoff , K D , Gulley , J D , Tulaczyk , S M , Covington , M D , Liu , X , Chen , Y , Benn , D I & GŁowacki , P S 2017 , ' Roughness of a subglacial conduit under Hansbreen, Svalbard ' , Journal of Glaciology , vol. 63 , no. 239 , pp. 423-435 . https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.134en
dc.identifier.issn0022-1430
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 250199256
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 90c333fa-3c42-4c60-9952-8889b48a12b0
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85019544529
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000401649100003
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3604-0886/work/64697406
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/10934
dc.descriptionK.M., J.G., X.L. and Y.C. were supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. #1503928. Thefieldwork team (K.M., J.G., M.C.) were supported by the Norwegian Arctic Research Council and Svalbard Science Forum, RiS #6106. K.M. was also supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)Headquarters under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program – Grant NNX10AN83H, the University of California, Santa Cruz, and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Ocean and Climate Change Institute post-graduate fellowship. Portions of this work were conducted while J.G. was supported by the NSF EAR Postdoctoral Fellowship (#0946767). S.T. was funded by NASA grant NNX11AH61G.en
dc.description.abstractHydraulic roughness exerts an important but poorly understood control on water pressure in subglacial conduits. Where relative roughness values are <5%, hydraulic roughness can be related to relative roughness using empirically-derived equations such as the Colebrook-White equation. General relationships between hydraulic roughness and relative roughness do not exist for relative roughness >5%. Here we report the first quantitative assessment of roughness heights and hydraulic diameters in a subglacial conduit. We measured roughness heights in a 125 m long section of a subglacial conduit using structure-from-motion to produce a digital surface model, and hand-measurements of the b-axis of rocks. We found roughness heights from 0.07 to 0.22 m and cross-sectional areas of 1-2 m2, resulting in relative roughness of 3-12% and >5% for most locations. A simple geometric model of varying conduit diameter shows that when the conduit is small relative roughness is >30% and has large variability. Our results suggest that parameterizations of conduit hydraulic roughness in subglacial hydrological models will remain challenging until hydraulic diameters exceed roughness heights by a factor of 20, or the conduit radius is >1 m for the roughness elements observed here.
dc.format.extent13
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Glaciologyen
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2017. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectGlacier hydrologyen
dc.subjectRoughnessen
dc.subjectSubglacial conduitsen
dc.subjectG Geography (General)en
dc.subjectGB Physical geographyen
dc.subjectEarth-Surface Processesen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccG1en
dc.subject.lccGBen
dc.titleRoughness of a subglacial conduit under Hansbreen, Svalbarden
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography and Geosciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.134
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record