Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDennis, Ashley
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Lisi
dc.contributor.authorHowden, Stella
dc.contributor.authorJindal-Snape, Divya
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-07T13:30:09Z
dc.date.available2017-06-07T13:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationDennis , A , Gordon , L , Howden , S & Jindal-Snape , D 2017 , ' An evaluation of a Scottish higher education ‘Student Transitions’ Enhancement Theme : stakeholders’ perceptions and recommendations for future activities ' Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice , vol. 5 , no. 2 , pp. 22-30 . https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v5i2.270en
dc.identifier.issn2051-9788
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 250188588
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: a13daaca-7413-4c73-81e0-fab1d16dcb57
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4986-1501/work/56523504
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/10933
dc.descriptionWe would like to acknowledge that this work was funded by QAA Scotland.en
dc.description.abstractThe Quality Assurance Agency Enhancement Themes identify specific development themes to enhance the student learning experience in Scottish higher education (HE). This evaluation explored the second year of the ‘Student Transitions’ theme through the questions: How do stakeholders perceive the impact of the ‘Student Transitions’ work and, what are the facilitators and barriers to the successful development of projects? Data were collected during two overlapping phases. In Phase 1, 30 individuals, with national or institutional leadership roles associated with the current Enhancement Theme participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. In Phase 2, 43 online questionnaires were completed by institutionally nominated individuals. Professional, support and academic staff, and student representatives from all 19 Scottish Universities participated. Data were analysed using a thematic framework approach and descriptive statistics. Themes developed were: perceived impact; facilitators and barriers, such as support, engagement and sustainability. These themes were explored across institutions and sector wide. Participants felt ‘Student Transitions’ work was fundamental for Universities. Participants considered that Theme work had enhanced reflection on, and engagement with transition issues. Capturing direct impact was challenging for participants and it was proposed that it may take several years to evidence the outcomes of the work at the level of student experience. Broadly, participants reported that the sector was supportive and collaborative where ideas and resources for the ‘Student Transitions’ work had been openly shared. Challenges to advancing Enhancement Theme activities include limited time and other agendas competing for limited resources e.g. the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF). The findings highlight the complexity of integrating the Theme within institutions and broadly across the sector. Key recommendations and lessons learned surround 1) defining and measuring impact; 2) enhancing engagement; 3) and Theme integration.
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practiceen
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Open Access article. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.en
dc.subjectInstitutional evaluationen
dc.subjectStudent transitionsen
dc.subjectStudent involvementen
dc.subjectQuality Assurance Agencyen
dc.subjectEnhancement Themesen
dc.subjectLB2300 Higher Educationen
dc.subjectH Social Sciencesen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccLB2300en
dc.subject.lccHen
dc.titleAn evaluation of a Scottish higher education ‘Student Transitions’ Enhancement Theme : stakeholders’ perceptions and recommendations for future activitiesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Managementen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v5i2.270
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record