Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCotnoir, A. J.
dc.identifier.citationCotnoir , A J 2017 , ' Mutual Indwelling ' , Faith and Philosophy , vol. 34 , no. 2 , pp. 123-151 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 249098962
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f169e126-b392-494e-b4ec-ed5dffb47b48
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85020213670
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000401421100001
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4528-7570/work/65702606
dc.descriptionWork on this article was generously supported in the form of a Summer Stipend by the Classical Theism Project at the University of St. Thomas (MN) and the John Templeton Foundation.en
dc.description.abstractPerichoresis, or “mutual indwelling,” is a crucial concept in Trinitarian theology. But the philosophical underpinnings of the concept are puzzling. According to ordinary conceptions of “indwelling” or “being in,” it is incoherent to think that two entities could be in each other. In this paper, I propose a mereological way of understanding “being in,” by analogy with standard examples in contemporary metaphysics. I argue that this proposal does not conflict with the doctrine of divine simplicity, but instead affirms it. I conclude by discussing how mutual indwelling relates to the concepts of unity (modal inseparability) and identity (qualitative indiscernibility).
dc.relation.ispartofFaith and Philosophyen
dc.rights© 2017 Society of Christian Philosophers. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at:
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.titleMutual Indwellingen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record