Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorScheipers, Sibylle
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-28T14:30:13Z
dc.date.available2017-03-28T14:30:13Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationScheipers , S 2014 , ' Fighting irregular fighters: Is the law of armed conflict outdated? ' , Parameters , vol. 43 , no. 4 , pp. 45-56 .en
dc.identifier.issn0031-1723
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 249429349
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 9857fb6a-24fe-4b8d-97fa-7c56c920f4c0
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8080-3337/work/76386913
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/10542
dc.description.abstractThe law of armed conflict has often been described as outdated and ill suited to military conflicts in the twenty-first century. Both academics and practitioners have argued that today’s wars tend to be asymmetric conflicts between states and nonstate actors, whereas the law of armed conflict was made with a view to symmetrical interstate war. This article challenges that notion.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofParametersen
dc.rights© 2013 Sibylle Scheipers. This work has been made available online with permission from the publisher. This is the final published version of the work, which was originally published by Parameters.en
dc.titleFighting irregular fighters: Is the law of armed conflict outdated?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of International Relationsen
dc.description.statusNon peer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/Parameters/Issues/Winter_2013/TheQuarterly_Winter2013-14_v43n4.pdfen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record