Files in this item
Fighting irregular fighters: Is the law of armed conflict outdated?
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Scheipers, Sibylle | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-28T14:30:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-28T14:30:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Scheipers , S 2014 , ' Fighting irregular fighters: Is the law of armed conflict outdated? ' , Parameters , vol. 43 , no. 4 , pp. 45-56 . | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0031-1723 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 249429349 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 9857fb6a-24fe-4b8d-97fa-7c56c920f4c0 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0001-8080-3337/work/76386913 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/10542 | |
dc.description.abstract | The law of armed conflict has often been described as outdated and ill suited to military conflicts in the twenty-first century. Both academics and practitioners have argued that today’s wars tend to be asymmetric conflicts between states and nonstate actors, whereas the law of armed conflict was made with a view to symmetrical interstate war. This article challenges that notion. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Parameters | en |
dc.rights | © 2013 Sibylle Scheipers. This work has been made available online with permission from the publisher. This is the final published version of the work, which was originally published by Parameters. | en |
dc.subject | SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions | en |
dc.title | Fighting irregular fighters: Is the law of armed conflict outdated? | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of International Relations | en |
dc.description.status | Non peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | http://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/Parameters/Issues/Winter_2013/TheQuarterly_Winter2013-14_v43n4.pdf | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.