Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorScheipers, Sibylle
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-28T14:30:13Z
dc.date.available2017-03-28T14:30:13Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier249429349
dc.identifier9857fb6a-24fe-4b8d-97fa-7c56c920f4c0
dc.identifier.citationScheipers , S 2014 , ' Fighting irregular fighters: Is the law of armed conflict outdated? ' , Parameters , vol. 43 , no. 4 , pp. 45-56 .en
dc.identifier.issn0031-1723
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8080-3337/work/76386913
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/10542
dc.description.abstractThe law of armed conflict has often been described as outdated and ill suited to military conflicts in the twenty-first century. Both academics and practitioners have argued that today’s wars tend to be asymmetric conflicts between states and nonstate actors, whereas the law of armed conflict was made with a view to symmetrical interstate war. This article challenges that notion.
dc.format.extent297363
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofParametersen
dc.subjectSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutionsen
dc.titleFighting irregular fighters: Is the law of armed conflict outdated?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of International Relationsen
dc.description.statusNon peer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/Parameters/Issues/Winter_2013/TheQuarterly_Winter2013-14_v43n4.pdfen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record