Files in this item
Fighting irregular fighters: Is the law of armed conflict outdated?
|dc.identifier.citation||Scheipers , S 2014 , ' Fighting irregular fighters: Is the law of armed conflict outdated? ' , Parameters , vol. 43 , no. 4 , pp. 45-56 .||en|
|dc.identifier.other||PURE UUID: 9857fb6a-24fe-4b8d-97fa-7c56c920f4c0|
|dc.description.abstract||The law of armed conflict has often been described as outdated and ill suited to military conflicts in the twenty-first century. Both academics and practitioners have argued that today’s wars tend to be asymmetric conflicts between states and nonstate actors, whereas the law of armed conflict was made with a view to symmetrical interstate war. This article challenges that notion.|
|dc.rights||© 2013 Sibylle Scheipers. This work has been made available online with permission from the publisher. This is the final published version of the work, which was originally published by Parameters.||en|
|dc.title||Fighting irregular fighters: Is the law of armed conflict outdated?||en|
|dc.contributor.institution||University of St Andrews.School of International Relations||en|
|dc.description.status||Non peer reviewed||en|
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.