The rich get richer, the poor get even : perceived socioeconomic position influences micro-social distributions of wealth
MetadataShow full item record
Economic inequality has a robust negative effect on a range of important societal outcomes, including health, wellbeing, and education. Yet, it remains insufficiently understood why, how, and by whom unequal systems tend to be perpetuated. In two studies we examine whether psychological mindsets adopted by the wealthy and the poor in their micro-social transactions act to perpetuate or challenge inequality. We hypothesized that occupying a wealthier socio-economic position promotes the pursuit of self-interest and contributes to inequality maintenance; poorer socio-economic position, on the other hand, should promote the pursuit of fairness and equality restoration. In Study 1, participants completed an Ultimatum Game as proposers after being primed to believe they are wealthier or poorer, offering money to either poor or wealthy responders. As expected, the wealthy pursued their self-interest and the net effect of this behavior contributes to the maintenance of inequality. Conversely, the poor pursued fairness and the net effect of this behavior challenges inequality. In Study 2, participants were responders deciding whether to accept or reject unfair distributions. Compared to the wealthier, the poorer challenged inequality by rejecting unequal offers. The links between micro-social processes and macro-societal inequality are discussed.
Bratanova , B A , Loughnan , S , Klein , O & Wood , R 2016 , ' The rich get richer, the poor get even : perceived socioeconomic position influences micro-social distributions of wealth ' Scandinavian Journal of Psychology , vol 57 , no. 3 , pp. 243–249 . DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12281
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
© 2016 Scandinavian Psychological Associations and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12281
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.