Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorMcCauley, Darren
dc.contributor.advisorWarren, Charles Raymond
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Kirsten
dc.coverage.spatial328 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-09T10:48:10Z
dc.date.available2017-02-09T10:48:10Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-21
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/10255
dc.description.abstractThe energy sector faces sustainability challenges that are re-working the established patterns of energy supply, distribution and consumption (Anderson et al. 2008; Haas et al. 2008; Stern 2008; Shove and Walker 2010). Amidst these challenges, socio-technical energy transitions frameworks have evolved that focus on transitions towards decarbonised, sustainable energy systems (Bridge et al. 2013). However, the ‘socio-‘ or social is typically missing as we confront climate and energy risks in a moral vacuum (Sovacool et al. 2016). The energy justice framework provides a structure to think about such energy dilemmas. However, the full extent and diversity of justice implications within the energy system have been neglected. Thus, borrowing from and advancing the framework this research explores how energy justice is being articulated with attention to three emergent areas of growth, the themes of: (1) time, (2) systems component and (3) actor. It does so through a case study of nuclear energy, which was chosen because of its points of enquiry with regards to these three areas of growth, and its historical and on-going importance in the UK energy mix. Using results from 36 semi-structured interviews with non-governmental organisations and policy actors across two case studies representative of the nuclear energy stages of energy production and of waste storage, disposal and reprocessing – the Hinkley Point and Sellafield nuclear complexes – this research presents new insights within each of these previously identified areas of development. It offers the contributions of (1) facility lifecycles, (2) systems approaches and (3) the question of ‘justice by whom?’ and concludes that the energy justice framework can aid energy decision-making in a way that not only mitigates the environmental impacts of energy via socio-technical change, but also does so in an ethically defensible, socially just, way.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrewsen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEnergy justiceen_US
dc.subjectNuclear energyen_US
dc.subjectEnergy policyen_US
dc.subjectSocio-technical systemsen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subject.lccTJ163.2J4
dc.subject.lcshPower resources--Social aspects--Case studiesen
dc.subject.lcshEnvironmental justiceen
dc.subject.lcshDistributive justiceen
dc.subject.lcshNuclear energy--Great Britain--Social aspectsen
dc.titleDiscourses of energy justice : the case of nuclear energyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US


The following license files are associated with this item:

    This item appears in the following Collection(s)

    Show simple item record

    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's license for re-use is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International