Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorFiori, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorRinesi, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Elspeth
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-07T13:30:35Z
dc.date.available2017-02-07T13:30:35Z
dc.date.issued2017-07
dc.identifier.citationFiori , F , Rinesi , F & Graham , E 2017 , ' Choosing to remain childless? A comparative study of fertility intentions among women and men in Italy and Britain ' , European Journal of Population , vol. 33 , no. 3 , pp. 319-350 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-016-9404-2en
dc.identifier.issn0168-6577
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 246879465
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 965d1f09-7bb4-452a-977d-33df4671f320
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85011615020
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000404654600002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/10243
dc.descriptionThis research was supported by the ESRC Centre for Population Change (grant number RES-625-28-0001 and ES/K007394/1).en
dc.description.abstractPathways to childlessness may differ not only between individuals but also at the population level. This paper investigates differences in childlessness by comparing two countries – Britain and Italy – where levels of childlessness are high in comparison with many other European countries, but which have distinct fertility trajectories and family regimes. Using data from two large, representative national samples of women and men of reproductive age in a co-residential partnership, it presents a rich analysis of the characteristics associated with intended childlessness, net of the aspects associated with being childless at interview. Although childlessness intentions are generally comparable between men and women of the same age, results show a link between socio-economic disadvantage and childlessness for British men as well as the importance of men’s employment for childbearing decisions in Italy. These findings support the view that pathways into childlessness are gendered and highlight the importance of partnership context in the understanding of fertility intentions. Then, the level of childlessness at interview is comparable across the two countries. However, a higher proportion of respondents in Italy is only provisionally childless whereas a larger proportion of British respondents intends to remain childless. Framing these differences in fertility intentions within the wider context of family and fertility regimes allows insight into the extent to which observed levels of lifetime childlessness at the population level might result from a specific combination of intended childlessness, postponed decisions leading to involuntary childlessness, or constraints affecting individual abilities to achieve their intentions at the individual level.
dc.format.extent32
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Populationen
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2017 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en
dc.subjectChildlessness intentionsen
dc.subjectItalyen
dc.subjectBritainen
dc.subjectGender differencesen
dc.subjectH Social Sciencesen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectGF Human ecology. Anthropogeographyen
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subject.lccHen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.subject.lccGFen
dc.titleChoosing to remain childless? A comparative study of fertility intentions among women and men in Italy and Britainen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorEconomic & Social Research Councilen
dc.contributor.sponsorEconomic & Social Research Councilen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Population Changeen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-016-9404-2
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-02-03
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/K007394/1en
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/G027153/1en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record