Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorFrejka, Tomas
dc.contributor.authorGietel-Basten, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorAbolina, Liga
dc.contributor.authorAbuladze, Liili
dc.contributor.authorAksyonova, Svitlina
dc.contributor.authorAkrap, AnĎelko
dc.contributor.authorAntipova, Ekaterina
dc.contributor.authorBobic, Mirjana
dc.contributor.authorČipin, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorFakeyeva, Liudmila
dc.contributor.authorFoldes, Ionut
dc.contributor.authorJasilioniene, Aiva
dc.contributor.authorKostova, Dora
dc.contributor.authorKotowska, Irena
dc.contributor.authorKrimer, Boris
dc.contributor.authorvon der Lippe, Elena
dc.contributor.authorKurylo, Iryna
dc.contributor.authorMaslauskaite, Ausra
dc.contributor.authorMikolai, Julia
dc.contributor.authorMuresan, Cornelia
dc.contributor.authorPetar, Vasic
dc.contributor.authorPotančoková, Michaela
dc.contributor.authorPronko, Tatyana
dc.contributor.authorPuur, Allan
dc.contributor.authorRasevic, Mirjana
dc.contributor.authorRybińska, Anna
dc.contributor.authorSakkeus, Luule
dc.contributor.authorSambt, Jože
dc.contributor.authorSobotka, Tomáš
dc.contributor.authorŠprocha, Branislav
dc.contributor.authorStaddon, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorStankuniene, Vlada
dc.contributor.authorŠtastná, Anna
dc.contributor.authorStrmota, Marin
dc.contributor.authorStropnik, Nada
dc.contributor.authorTymicki, Krzysztof
dc.contributor.authorVishnevsky, Anatoly
dc.contributor.authorZakharov, Sergei
dc.contributor.authorZeman, Kryštof
dc.contributor.authorZvidrins, Peteris
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-02T16:30:09Z
dc.date.available2017-02-02T16:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-23
dc.identifier.citationFrejka , T , Gietel-Basten , S , Abolina , L , Abuladze , L , Aksyonova , S , Akrap , A , Antipova , E , Bobic , M , Čipin , I , Fakeyeva , L , Foldes , I , Jasilioniene , A , Kostova , D , Kotowska , I , Krimer , B , von der Lippe , E , Kurylo , I , Maslauskaite , A , Mikolai , J , Muresan , C , Petar , V , Potančoková , M , Pronko , T , Puur , A , Rasevic , M , Rybińska , A , Sakkeus , L , Sambt , J , Sobotka , T , Šprocha , B , Staddon , R , Stankuniene , V , Štastná , A , Strmota , M , Stropnik , N , Tymicki , K , Vishnevsky , A , Zakharov , S , Zeman , K & Zvidrins , P 2016 , ' Fertility and family policies in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990 ' , Comparative Population Studies , vol. 41 , no. 1 , pp. 3-56 . https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2016-03enen
dc.identifier.issn1869-8980
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 249049640
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 16b9d791-70cf-498a-8e6c-ec4d0e51ef11
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84978387801
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7733-6659/work/48516897
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/10221
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines fertility and family policies in 15 Central and East European (CEE) countries to establish firstly, likely directions of cohort fertility trends for the coming decade; and secondly, to provide an overview and analysis of family policies in CEE countries, and to assess their impact on cohort fertility trends. Demographic analysis suggests that the cohort fertility decline of the 1960s cohorts is likely to continue at least among the 1970s birth cohorts; stagnation cannot be ruled out. Births that were postponed by women born in the 1970s were not being replaced in sufficient numbers for cohort fertility to increase in the foreseeable future, and shares of low parity women (childless and one child) were larger than shares of high parity women among the late 1960s cohorts than in older cohorts. Also, childbearing postponement which started in the 1990s is reflected in dramatic changes of childbearing age patterns. As period fertility rates have been increasing in the late 2000s throughout the region an impression of a fertility recovery has been created, however the findings of this project indicate that no such widespread childbearing recovery is underway. For the first time ever an overview and analysis of CEE family policies is conceptualized in this paper. It demonstrates that fertility trends and family policies are a matter of serious concern throughout the region. The following family policy types have been identified: comprehensive family policy model; pro-natalist policies model; temporary male bread-winner model; and conventional family policies model. The majority of family policies in CEE countries suffer from a variety of shortcomings that impede them from generating enhanced family welfare and from providing conditions for cohort fertility to increase. The likely further decline of cohort fertility, or its stagnation, may entail long-term demographic as well as other societal consequences, such as continuous declines in total population numbers, changes in age structures, as well as implications for health and social security costs.
dc.format.extent54
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofComparative Population Studiesen
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2016 CC BY-SAen
dc.subjectCentral and eastern Europeen
dc.subjectFamily policiesen
dc.subjectFamily policy typologyen
dc.subjectFertilityen
dc.subjectInternational comparative analysisen
dc.subjectG Geography. Anthropology. Recreationen
dc.subjectDAW Central Europeen
dc.subjectDJK Eastern Europeen
dc.subjectDemographyen
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subject.lccGen
dc.subject.lccDAWen
dc.subject.lccDJKen
dc.titleFertility and family policies in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2016-03en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record