Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorThapar-Björkert, Suruchi
dc.contributor.authorSamelius, Lotta
dc.contributor.authorSanghera, Gurchathen S.
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-02T00:32:38Z
dc.date.available2017-02-02T00:32:38Z
dc.date.issued2016-02
dc.identifier.citationThapar-Björkert , S , Samelius , L & Sanghera , G S 2016 , ' Exploring symbolic violence in the everyday : misrecognition, condescension, consent and complicity ' Feminist Review , vol. 112 , no. 1 , pp. 144-162 . https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.53en
dc.identifier.issn0141-7789
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 241426341
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 7e4e4e18-cea0-4b11-8872-b6c916793750
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84958656096
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/10214
dc.descriptionThe empirical material for the article was collected during a project funded by FAS (now FORTE), the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare.en
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we draw on Pierre Bourdieu's concepts of 'misrecognition', 'condescension' and 'consent and complicity' to demonstrate how domination and violence are reproduced in everyday interactions, social practices, institutional processes and dispositions. Importantly, this constitutes symbolic violence, which removes the victim's agency and voice. Indeed, we argue that as symbolic violence is impervious, insidious and invisible, it also simultaneously legitimises and sustains other forms of violence as well. Understanding symbolic violence together with traditional discourses of violence is important because it provides a richer insight into the 'workings' of violence, and provides new ways of conceptualising violence across a number of social fields and new strategies for intervention. Symbolic violence is a valuable tool for understanding contentious debates on the disclosure of violence, women leaving or staying in abusive relationships or returning to their abusers. While we focus only on violence against women, we recognise that the gendered nature of violence produces its own sets of vulnerabilities against men and marginalised groups, such as LGBT. The paper draws on empirical research conducted in Sweden in 2003. Sweden is an interesting case study because despite its progressive gender equality policies, there has been no marked decrease in violence towards women by men.
dc.format.extent19
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFeminist Reviewen
dc.rights© Feminist Review 2016. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.53en
dc.subjectSymbolic violenceen
dc.subjectConsenten
dc.subjectComplicityen
dc.subjectMisrecognitionen
dc.subjectCondescensionen
dc.subjectBourdieuen
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectGender Studiesen
dc.subjectArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)en
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleExploring symbolic violence in the everyday : misrecognition, condescension, consent and complicityen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of International Relationsen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.53
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-02-01


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record