Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHarris, Celia
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Akira Robert
dc.contributor.authorSutton, John
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-22T00:31:56Z
dc.date.available2017-01-22T00:31:56Z
dc.date.issued2015-05
dc.identifier.citationHarris , C , O'Connor , A R & Sutton , J 2015 , ' Cue generation and memory construction in direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval ' , Consciousness and Cognition , vol. 33 , pp. 204-216 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.012en
dc.identifier.issn1053-8100
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 159931224
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 78de6e6a-d5e4-435b-87c0-d37ff2b1bfa8
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84921530806
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7943-5183/work/34028964
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000352927800018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/10143
dc.descriptionThe authors acknowledge the funding support we have received: (1) a Macquarie University Research Fellowship for Celia Harris; (2) support from the Belief Program of the ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders for Celia Harris and Akira O’Connor; (3) a Macquarie University Faculty of Human Sciences Visiting Fellowship for Celia Harris and Akira O’Connor to collaborate together; and (4) support from the Australian Research Council Discovery Projects scheme for Celia Harris (DP130101090) and John Sutton (DP120100187).en
dc.description.abstractTheories of autobiographical memory emphasise effortful, generative search processes in memory retrieval. However recent research suggests that memories are often retrieved directly, without effortful search. We investigated whether direct and generative retrieval differed in the characteristics of memories recalled, or only in terms of retrieval latency. Participants recalled autobiographical memories in response to cue words. For each memory, they reported whether it was retrieved directly or generatively, rated its visuo-spatial perspective, and judged its accompanying recollective experience. Our results indicated that direct retrieval was commonly reported and was faster than generative retrieval, replicating recent findings. The characteristics of directly retrieved memories differed from generatively retrieved memories: directly retrieved memories had higher field perspective ratings and lower observer perspective ratings. However, retrieval mode did not influence recollective experience. We discuss our findings in terms of cue generation and content construction, and the implication for reconstructive models of autobiographical memory.
dc.format.extent13
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofConsciousness and Cognitionen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Consciousness and Cognition. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Consciousness and Cognition, 33 (2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.012en
dc.subjectAutobiographical memoryen
dc.subjectDirect retrievalen
dc.subjectGenerative retrievalen
dc.subjectVisuo-spatial perspectiveen
dc.subjectRecollective experienceen
dc.subjectMemory reconstructionen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleCue generation and memory construction in direct and generative autobiographical memory retrievalen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.012
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-01-21


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record