Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHarrow, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorJung, Tobias
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-02T00:32:13Z
dc.date.available2017-01-02T00:32:13Z
dc.date.issued2016-01
dc.identifier.citationHarrow , J & Jung , T 2016 , ' Philanthropy and community development : the vital signs of community foundation? ' , Community Development Journal , vol. 51 , no. 1 , pp. 132-152 . https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsv056en
dc.identifier.issn0010-3802
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 222561865
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 4b1f8078-bfa2-4a26-8c3c-ebf6c358761c
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84960109138
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9371-404X/work/57476297
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000368415800009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/10027
dc.descriptionThis self-funded research builds on earlier support for the study of community foundations within philanthropy from the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), grant reference RES-593-25-0004.en
dc.description.abstractIncreased funding pressures on community development and reductions in governmental funding for community support suggest potent roles for philanthropy as a funding source, and the possibility of changing relationships between community development and philanthropy. Focusing on English community foundations and their implementation of the Canadian Vital Signs initiative, which is geared towards assessing communities’ vitality and social priorities, our article explores whether, and how, such changes may be occurring. Using the literature on the respective value of ‘unsettling’ and ‘settled’ third sector organisations to community development, we reflect on the roles and contributions of community foundations to community development through community philanthropy. Vital Signs reports’ content indicates donor-led community philanthropy associated with ameliorative rather than fundamental social change positions, as well as uncertainty surrounding community leadership in this context. We identify community foundations as ‘settled’ organisations within the community development spectrum and as reflecting the ‘directed’ community development form. In this instance, it appears that the philanthropy-community development gap that we suggest is at best being partially bridged. Nevertheless, and paradoxically, these organisations’ achievement of financial security through community donorship could also strengthen their community leadership roles in ‘unsettling’ ways, so doing more to lessen philanthropy and community development’s separation.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Development Journalen
dc.rights© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2015. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at http://cdj.oxfordjournals.org/content/51/1/132.abstracten
dc.subjectCommunity foundationsen
dc.subjectCommunity developmenten
dc.subjectPhilanthropyen
dc.subjectHN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reformen
dc.subjectHC Economic History and Conditionsen
dc.subject.lccHNen
dc.subject.lccHCen
dc.titlePhilanthropy and community development : the vital signs of community foundation?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Managementen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsv056
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-01-01


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record