Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBlair, E.
dc.contributor.authorDeacon, A.
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-23T00:32:21Z
dc.date.available2016-12-23T00:32:21Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-22
dc.identifier.citationBlair , E & Deacon , A 2015 , ' A holistic approach to fieldwork through balanced reflective practice ' Reflective Practice , vol. 16 , no. 3 , pp. 418-434 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2015.1052388en
dc.identifier.issn1462-3943
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 204850129
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 5f1467bb-db62-474f-a8c4-6befa7eda176
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84934434500
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000357020500009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/10009
dc.description.abstractReflective practice is well-established as a tool for practitioner development in areas such as nursing, social work and education. Reflection involves the integration of theoretical constructs and practical action; therefore it seems somewhat ironic that there is little written on reflective practice within the natural sciences – where theory and action are often juxtaposed. This paper attempts to address this gap through examining biological fieldwork in relation to a balanced system of reflection that embraces the cognitive, psychomotor, affective and conative aspects of practice. A model of reflective practice that asks practitioners to log their reflections against these four domains was applied to a biodiversity survey of tropical mountain streams in Trinidad. It was found that there is clear evidence that biological fieldwork can embrace a reflective methodology and that reflective practice can be used in fieldwork as a tool for making explicit that which is already implicit. A holistic vision of fieldwork is sketched out here, where the introduction of a balanced model of reflective practice can support an approach that moves beyond the consideration of the environment and the researcher as two separate entities and, instead, considers the relationship between environment and researcher.
dc.format.extent17
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofReflective Practiceen
dc.rights© 2015, Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at www.tandfonline.com / https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2015.1052388en
dc.subjectVitruvian Reflectionen
dc.subjectBiologyen
dc.subjectReflective frameworken
dc.subjectHolisticen
dc.subjectDomains of learningen
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectL Education (General)en
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.subject.lccL1en
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleA holistic approach to fieldwork through balanced reflective practiceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Fish Behaviour and Biodiversity Research Groupen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2015.1052388
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2016-12-22
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14623943.2015.1052388#.VmH64F7SfWken


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record