Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHammond, Philip S.
dc.contributor.advisorCockcroft, Vic
dc.contributor.advisorGraves, Jeff
dc.contributor.authorPenry, Gwenith S.
dc.coverage.spatial173en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-21T11:55:39Z
dc.date.available2010-06-21T11:55:39Z
dc.date.issued2010-06-23
dc.identifieruk.bl.ethos.552422
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/921
dc.description.abstractThe biology of South African Bryde’s whales (Balaenoptera brydei/edeni), with a focus on the inshore form, was investigated through estimates of abundance and survival rate, seasonality of occurrence and variation in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Photographs, sightings data and biopsy samples were collected in Plettenberg Bay, on the south-east coast of South Africa. Additional genetic material was obtained from the Iziko South African Museum, Marine and Coastal Management, and the Port Elizabeth Museum. Mark-recapture methods applied to photo-identification data were used to estimate abundance and survival rate. Estimates of abundance ranged from 130 to 250 (CV = 0.07 - 0.38) and the estimated annual survival rate was 0.93 (CV = 0.047, 95% CI = 0.852 - 1.0). Seasonal increases in the encounter rate and number of individual whales were observed during summer and autumn, with a peak in April, which corresponded to increased feeding activity and larger average aggregation sizes. Chlorophyll-a, sea surface temperature and wind speed were all significant factors in explaining the variability in the occurrence of whales. No seasonality in the occurrence of calves was detected. Mitochondrial DNA control region sequences (685bp) were compared to published sequences. This confirmed the offshore form as Balaenoptera brydei and the inshore form as closely related to B.brydei, possibly at the sub-specific level, but excluded it as B.edeni. Phylogenetic analyses support complete separation between the two forms. The use of 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci revealed no population structure among the inshore samples (FST = 0.006). Pairwise estimates of relatedness found most individuals to be unrelated, with only a few distant relatives detected.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.subjectBryde's whalesen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectAbundanceen_US
dc.subjectMitochondrial DNAen_US
dc.subjectTaxonomyen_US
dc.subjectSeasonalityen_US
dc.subjectMicrosatellite markersen_US
dc.subject.lccQL737.C424P46
dc.subject.lcshBryde whale--South Africaen_US
dc.titleThe biology of South African Bryde's whalesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.publisher.departmentThe Centre for Dolphin Studies, South Africaen_US


The following licence files are associated with this item:

  • Creative Commons

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported