Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorRhodes, Neil
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Emma Annette
dc.coverage.spatial329en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-02T12:29:25Z
dc.date.available2010-02-02T12:29:25Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/850
dc.description.abstractThe thesis pioneers a new methodology for the analysis of early modern literature: it embarks on a stylistic appreciation of Paradise Lost using early modern methods of interpretation and comprehension, specifically logic. In doing so it engages in the contest between historicist and stylistic criticism, providing a new methodology by which these two approaches are united to perform historically appropriate stylistic analysis of literary texts. Logic formed the bedrock of all early modern intellectual operations, including the literary, and it was the art used for all forms of analysis and interpretation. Yet in modern studies, logic has suffered from its own interdisciplinary dexterity: it is comparatively seldom studied, and when examined this tends to be in connection within a specific field of interest. As such there is a lack of a comprehensive developmental understanding of this subject in line with its original pragmatic purposes. This thesis addresses this quandary by examining a wide range of texts from the period to produce a syncretic appreciation of this art, similar to that acquired by early modern students. Having extrapolated the principles of early modern logic the second half of the thesis applies these in a practical way to analyse Milton’s style in Paradise Lost, reaching a new appreciation of the poem in accordance with the logical precepts that enabled its original production. The overarching aim of the thesis is to produce an innovative methodology enabling historically appropriate stylistic analysis of early modern texts, uniting the customarily disparate approaches of historicist and stylistic criticism in a literal and pragmatic way to open the possibility for future application of this methodology to other early modern literary texts.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subject.lccPR3562.W5
dc.subject.lcshMilton, John, 1608-1674. Paradise lost--Styleen
dc.subject.lcshMilton, John, 1608-1674. Paradise lost--Criticism and interpretationen
dc.subject.lcshMilton, John, 1608-1674--Knowledge--Logicen
dc.subject.lcshLogic in literatureen
dc.titleJohn Milton's use of logic in 'Paradise lost'en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2019-11-12en
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic version restricted until 12th November 2019en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record