Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorRhodes, Neil
dc.contributor.authorDi Ponio, Amanda Nina
dc.coverage.spatial295en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-16T11:07:07Z
dc.date.available2009-12-16T11:07:07Z
dc.date.issued2009-06-23
dc.identifieruk.bl.ethos.552236
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/836
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is an examination of the theoretical concepts of Antonin Artaud (1896-1948) and their relation to the Elizabethan theatre. I propose that the dramas of the age of Shakespeare and the environment in which they were produced should be seen as an integral part of the Theatre of Cruelty and essential to its very understanding. The development of the English Renaissance public theatre was at the mercy of periods of outbreaks and abatements of plague, a powerful force that Artaud considers to be the double of the theatre. The claim for regeneration as an outcome of the plague, a phenomenon causing intense destruction, is very specific to Artaud. The cruel and violent images associated with the plague also feature in the theatre, as do its destructive and regenerative powers. The plague and its surrounding atmosphere contain both the grotesque and sublime elements of life Artaud wished to capture in his theatre. His theory of cruelty is part of a larger investigation into the connection between spectacle, violence, and sacrifice explored by Mikhail Bakhtin, René Girard, and Georges Bataille.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectEnglish Renaissance dramaen_US
dc.subjectArtaudian drama and theoryen_US
dc.subject.lccPR658.C88D5
dc.subject.lcshArtaud, Antonin, 1896-1948--Criticism and interpretation.en
dc.subject.lcshEnglish drama--Early modern and Elizabethan, 1500-1600--History and criticismen
dc.subject.lcshCruelty in literatureen
dc.titleThe Elizabethan Theatre of Cruelty and its doubleen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Englishen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2024-05-12en
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Electronic version restricted until 12th May 2024. Illustrations permanently restricteden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record